Sunday, June 29, 2008

Obama will have us "Fleeced"

Dick Morris on how specifics will drag Obama down:


In our new book, Fleeced, we try to bring the debate back down to earth, focusing on the specific plans that Obama has announced during his presidential primary campaign and discussing the consequences. This is the debate Barack Obama hopes he can avoid.

Consider his proposals:

• In effect, he would legislate a 60 percent tax bracket for upper-income Americans, killing all initiative and innovation. He’d raise the top bracket to 40 percent. He’d apply FICA taxes to all income, not just that under $100,000 as at present. So add 40 percent plus FICA’s 12.5 percent plus Medicare’s 2 percent plus state and local taxes averaging, after deduction, at 5-6 percent, and you have a 60 percent bracket.

• He would double the capital gains tax, saddling the 50 percent of Americans who own stock with dramatically higher taxes.

• He’d double the dividend tax, hitting elderly coupon-clippers now retired and depending on fixed incomes.

• He wants to cover 12 million illegal immigrants with federally subsidized health insurance, dramatically driving up costs and forcing federal rationing of healthcare. As in the U.K. and Canada, you will not be permitted certain medical procedures if the bureaucrats decide you are not worth it.

• He proposes requiring Homeland Security operatives to notify terror suspects that they are under investigation within seven days of starting the investigation

• He says that unless they can establish that there is “probable cause to believe that a certain individual is linked to a specific terrorist group,” Homeland Security cannot seize his documents and search his business. The current standard is only that the search be “relevant” to a terror investigation.

• In effect, he would legislate a 60 percent tax bracket for upper-income Americans, killing all initiative and innovation. He’d raise the top bracket to 40 percent. He’d apply FICA taxes to all income, not just that under $100,000 as at present. So add 40 percent plus FICA’s 12.5 percent plus Medicare’s 2 percent plus state and local taxes averaging, after deduction, at 5-6 percent, and you have a 60 percent bracket.

He does not oppose $5-per-gallon gasoline but only says that he wishes there had been a more “gradual adjustment” to the higher prices.

Obama can talk about the Rev. Wright and flag lapel pins and his wife’s love of America all day long. But what he resists is a specific discussion of his own plans for our country. That’s the discussion he fears and he avoids. And it’s the discussion John McCain must force upon him if he is to have any realistic chance of winning the election.

NObama says NO way too many times

Nice McCain dig at "NO" Obama:




Obama the Natural-born US Citizen

Let me help the Obama camp on one item: "Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen"

Yes he is. He was born in Hawaii, and he was born after it became a state. He is a natural-born US citizen. Your detailed explanation is meaningless in this case as it would be a concern only if he was born overseas. He was not. He was born in Hawaii.

Some claim the birth certificate that has been presented is a fake. As there is no evidence the *location* of his birth was faked, there is no reason to be concerned on that point.

The Obama File, Wash Post, and Barack Obama's real roots

The Washington Post is going after Free Republic for going after Barack Obama's muslim roots, by reviewing a woman, Danielle Allen, who has been digging around to find out who is calling Barack Hussein Obama a Muslim. They found him - "Beckwith" - maintainer of The Obama File. A breathless article on finding a source you can get by googling in 3 minutes? Yup. Free Republic's "kristinn" answers. Freeper "Beckwith" responds:

The first thing I have to say about "An Attack That Came Out of the Ether," published by The Washington Post on June 28th, is that at NO time was I ever contacted by this woman, Danielle Allen. I spoke to two male Post reporters, who spoke to me over the phone for a period of months. The first contact was in the fall of 2007. They told me they were trying to track down the source of emails they considered negative to the Obamamessiah.

Allen obsesses about the "Muslim" Obama stories, but steers clear of Obama's relationships with communists, Marxists, socialists, terrorists and convicted swindlers. The trick she attempts to use is to knock down one or two or three items and the other four thousand don't count.

The following notice appears on my website's "About" page: "I don't write this stuff -- I cherry-pick it and publish it here -- every attempt is made to provide attribution and/or links to the original source -- if you don't like the writer's viewpoint -- send them an email -- not me. If the reader finds content that is incorrect, I will correct or delete it upon the submission of two links to an independent source with more accurate information."

And I mean just that and I do just that. I want The Obama File to be able to withstand the type of attack that Allen attempts in this article.
What we have here, in campaign terms, is a pre-emptive counterstrike against negative information. NextRight notes the contradictions.

A month ago, the press ran with the Obama's 'fightthesmears' website, pushing the Obama press release as a 'news story'. The subtext, that any criticism of Obama was illegitimate and wrong, was clear, and made clearer when Obama himself paired critiques of his inexperience with racism. Now we have a further attempt to in effect demonize the right as an 'innoculation' on the expected "Swiftboat" attack. By "Swiftboat" they mean when a right-wing source 'smears' them, ie, outs the liberal Democrat candidate for faking his biography. The worst crime you can commit is apparently the crime of undermining a liberal's campaign narrative.

There is no secret conspiracy to push the question of Obama's whitewashed bio, it's out in the open:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/765631/obama-and-the-giant-bl...

All Allen had to do was look up Barack Obama's first autobiography, and you'd find the *REAL* source of the Obama-Muslim links. His Muslim father, muslim step-father, muslim half-brother, muslim step-sister, his account of making faces during Koranic studies as a child growing up in Indonesia. You can then see the trajectory through this Nick Kristoff piece:

"He once got in trouble for making faces during Koran study classes in his elementary school, but a president is less likely to stereotype Muslims as fanatics — and more likely to be aware of their nationalism — if he once studied the Koran with them. Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as ‘one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.’ " - Nick Kristoff

(dont ask how Kristoff got be a frist-rate evaluator of Arabic accents; it sounds like he gate Obama a big wet kiss for the sophisticated white liberal looking for Mr International; now he's got to get those mainstreet USA votes, this will be quietly snuffed out.)

http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/771896/princess-obama-derange...

Melanie Phillips could have been interviewed. Daniel Pipes could have been quoted.

They could remind you that - according to muslims, if you say the call to prayer, you *are* a muslim. It's like a man reciting the Nicene creed or the Lord's prayer. It makes you go, hmmmm.

Especially when Obama has also said: "I've always been a Christian" yet his own bio shows no Christian affiliation (his white mother was a leftist secular type) until he was 30 years old and got hooked on Rev Wright's Black Liberation fulminations (hardly orthodox Christianity, and from a good friend of Farrakhan no less).

Now Barack Obama is not a Muslim. He is not, even though he ancestry is such and his blood relatives on his fathers side are. Just as the issue in John Kerry's case was not "did he serve with honor in Vitenam?" but more about how Kerry used one narrative way back when as a war protester and a wholly different narrative in 2004, so too is Obama doing the same. Black Liberation African-roots soul-searching in "Dreams of My father" has been white-washed into ads that tout his "Typical White Person" grandmother's influence and "Kansas values" and deny the Muslim roots.

As Melanie Phillips says: "The issue is NOT Obama’s religion, now or in the past. It is the many questions which need to be answered about a) why he has sought to conceal his early background; b) why he has so many indirect associations with radical Islamism; and c) whether these two questions are in some way related."

We have a man who grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia, yet has a vague and dishonest ad that speaks of growing up with Kansas values. None of the current campaign Obama comes through in the "Dreams of My Father" Obama of 1995. Obama's own autobiography is a different story:

From Dreams Of My Father, “NEVER EMULATE THE WHITE MEN and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. IT WAS INTO MY FATHER’S IMAGE, THE BLACK MAN, SON OF AFRICA, THAT I’D PACKED ALL THE ATTRIBUTES I SOUGHT IN MYSELF”.

From Dreams Of My Father:
“THAT HATE HADN’T GONE AWAY,” he wrote, BLAMING “WHITE PEOPLE— some cruel, some IGNORANT, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”

From Dreams Of My Father;
“There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs,” he wrote. “IT REMAINED NECESSARY TO PROVE WHICH SIDE YOU WERE ON, TO SHOW YOUR LOYALTY TO THE BLACK MASSES, TO STRIKE OUT, AND NAME NAMES. “
From Dreams of My Father, “ I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASIVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER’S RACE”.

From ‘Dreams of my Father’, “THE EMOTION BETWEEN THE RACES COULD NEVER BE PURE...THE OTHER RACE WOULD ALWAYS REMAIN JUST THAT; MENACING, ALIEN AND APART.”

Quote from Barack Obama’s book, Dreams Of My Father:
“THE PERSON WHO MADE ME PROUDEST OF ALL, though, was [HALF BROTHER ] ROY .. HE CONVERTED TO ISLAM” .

In that book, Barack Obama found his identity in his own father: A Socialist economist in the Kenyatta govt, a member of the Kenyan elite who was also a Muslim and polygamist. There is no discernable trace of Christian upbringing.

All that the Free Republic internet poster did was to recite these above particulars, and do it sooner than anyone else did. "Expat Guy", a blogger out of Indonesia, added some additional flavor by bringing up some quote from friends of "Barry Sotero" (his name back then) to fill in the gaps.Really, Allen and the Washington Post need not have dug so hard and so far to find a trail that really starts at Obama's own words and history. Instead, they should be examining the unexamined question of Barack Obama's real roots, real sentiments and real theology.

It is perhaps the keenest indication that there is something "there" to observe how the Obama camp and their proxies (like Allen, who gave Obama a $2700 contribution), are desperate to get such questions and issues labelled as 'smears' and 'swiftboating'. They are unintentionally signalling the importance of this issue with their hyper-concern.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/765631/obama-and-the-giant-bl...

Google Crushes NObama blogspot dissent!

Google closing NObama blogs:
I thought this was a fluke and that I was alone, until I went to the Hillary Clinton Forum and saw Nobama’s post “Blogger just shut down my NObama Blog!!“

Turns out that a number of us were “blocked”. The common thread, our membership in the Just Say No Deal Coalition — a coalition of millions with one thing in common: NObama. Then, Diane Mantouvalos, one of the founders of the coalition, advised the next day that her personal computer had been hacked.

Well, Obama and his supporters can knock Alice Palmer off the ballot, pilfer Hillary Clinton’s delegates in Michigan, and bamboozle the masses, but he cannot silence us and these tactics will only strengthen our resolve.

Uppity Woman has a running list of blogs affected as well. In an abundance of caution, she’s set up an alternate site to be used if and when her blogger site is blocked completely (I was shocked to learn that since June 3, she’s had to use word verification to create new posts.)

I should note that Google has done that to our other blog, Travis Monitor (making us use word verifcation). There is something afoot!

Saturday, June 28, 2008

Ratings Game - McCain v Obama

Here are some ratings for comparison:

American Conservative Union
http://www.acuratings.org/2007senate.htm

McCain: 82, Obama: 8, Clinton: 8

Americans for Tax Reform
http://www.atr.org/national/ratings/2008candidateratings.html

McCain: 83, Obama: 8, Clinton: 7

Citizens Against Government Waste
http://www.cagw.org/site/VoteCenter?page=congScorecard

McCain: 95, Obama: 30, Clinton: 14

National Taxpayers Union
http://www.ntu.org/misc_items/rating/VS_2006.pdf

McCain: 88, Obama: 16, Clinton: 17




Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Dobson v Obama

Dr Dobson took Obama to task over his arguable statements in a speech on religion:

"I think he's deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology." Dobson said.

Obama dismisses Dobson criticism about Bible with: "somebody would be pretty hard-pressed to make that argument" that he was distorting the Bible. Um, no, Dobson just did. Dobson is a mainline evangelical, and Obama went to a Black Liberation Theology church and had no religious training growing up except for that time when he was studying the Quran. Who's the expert and who's the pandering politician?

Obama and ACORN

The ACORN Obama Knows. Michell Malkin on ACORNs voter fraud problems:

Don't bother asking Barack Obama. He cut his ideological teeth working with ACORN as a "community organizer" and legal representative. Naturally, ACORN's political action committee has warmly endorsed his presidential candidacy. ACORN head Maude Hurd gushes that Obama is the candidate who "best understands and can affect change on the issues ACORN cares about" -- like ensuring their massive pipeline to your hard-earned money. Let's take a closer look at the ACORN Obama knows.

Last July, ACORN settled the largest case of voter fraud in the history of Washington State. Seven ACORN workers had submitted nearly 2,000 bogus voter registration forms. According to case records, they flipped through phone books for names to use on the forms, including "Leon Spinks," "Frekkie Magoal" and "Fruto Boy Crispila." Three ACORN election hoaxers pleaded guilty in October. A King County prosecutor called ACORN's criminal sabotage "an act of vandalism upon the voter rolls."
The group's vandalism on electoral integrity is systemic. ACORN has been implicated in similar voter fraud schemes in Missouri, Ohio and at least 12 other states.
As the Consumer Rights League points out in its new expose, the ACORN Housing Corporation has worked to obtain mortgages for illegal aliens in partnership with Citibank. It relies on undocumented income, "under the table" money, which may not be reported to the Internal Revenue Service. Moreover, the group's "financial justice" operations attack lenders for "exotic" loans, while recommending 10-year interest-only loans (which deny equity to the buyer) and risky reverse mortgages. Whistleblower documents reveal internal discussions among the group that blur the lines between its tax-exempt housing work and its aggressive electioneering activities. The group appears to shake down corporate interests with relentless PR attacks, and then enters "no lobby" agreements with targeted corporations after receiving payment.

Obama wants to give ACORN more taxpayer money, praises them as a good organization, and supports their activities. Egads.

Thin-skinned Obama

Bozell: 'Demonization' By Democrats? Surely You Jest: "leftists are already displaying their hypocrisy. They've launched pre-emptive warnings against a Republican "swiftboating" of Barack Obama at the same time they're making up wild allegations about the villainous ultraconservative plots against goodness planned by John McCain."

He points out: "Cynical liberals think that the only way Obama can lose is for conservatives to take their well-traveled "low road" with negative ads. They've utterly forgotten — if they ever acknowledged — the low road they've traveled with millions of dollars in harsh ads against George W. Bush in the last two election cycles."

Obama is counting on the years of negative campaigning and Bush-bashing to do the work for him so he doesn't have to campaign on anything except vaporous fumes of Hope and Change. He will look positive because the leftwing media and MoveOn surrogates have done the dirty work for him. But he wants mroe than that. He wants to tag every critic of his as a "divisive" racist.

Barack Obama is a lying, plagiarizing, flipflopping, elitist, arrogant, leftwing socialist with poor judgment and radical extremist friends and associates, including the racist pastor Rev Wright, who he called his friend and mentor for 20 years and ex-terrorist and current radical William Ayers. Obama was rated the most liberal Senator in 2007 by national journal and has otherwise hid his paper thin record with a series of cowardly ‘present’ votes and recent flipflops. Obama is not just an empty suit, but a cheap, easily foldable empty suit. Obama will hurt our economy with his higher taxes, hurt our culture with pro-abortion extremism and racial grievance politics, and get Americans killed with his naive and weak foreign policy. Oh, and did I mention he’s as crooked as all the Chicago politicians?

If that is not enough material to bury him, what is?

It is completely playing into the MSM and Obamedia and Obama campaign to let Obama be offlimits. Why? Because Obama wants a referendum on Bush. Because the Obamessiah sheen, that phony and plagiarized lie that Obama is different, is the image he needs. If that’s the vote Obama wins. McCain has to make this a referendum on *Obama*. Not the campaign material Obama, but the real gaffe-prone poor judgment leftwing inexperienced all-talk-no-cattle Obama. Do we really want the LEAST QUALIFIED AND MOST LEFTWING NOMINEE EVER to be our President? Do we? Obama thinks its racist to even raise the question. I ask: CAN WE TRUST SOMEONE SO THIN-SKINNED AND INTOLERANT OF CRITICISM TO BE OUR PRESIDENT?

The answer is NObama!

Obama Jumps the Seal

Other people jump the shark ... Obama has Officially Jumped the Seal!

Obama's Presidential "Seal" = Dukakis' Tank says Sheri Jacobus: "Much like Michael Dukakis' now famous ill-fated staged gaffe in his failed 1988 presidential bid where he sat in a military tank wearing an oversized army helmet as a short cut to credibility on military issues, Obama's impersonation of Commander-In-Chief may go down in history as similar folly."

It may well be that this exemplifies the 'not ready' nature of the candidate and undermines exactly what he was trying to show: "Hey, look at me, I can be President." No, more like you can look like a guy on Saturday Night Live pretending to be President.

Race is Tied - 45% each

10% undecided make it 'anybody's race to win' right now. But the advantage might go to McCain on account of him being the far more qualified and the fact that Obama has yet to be seriously examined as for character, judgement, and qualifications by the voters.
It's been very superficial so far.

Obama Team "Dont Trust us"

"I don’t think you should necessarily trust an Obama Administration anymore than you should trust a Bush Administration or a McCain Administration."

— Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs, at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast with reporters, on the FISA wiretapping legislation.

What Obama would do on FISA and Iraq

Obama's Unpaid Parking Tickets

... are a small window into his careless character. Small Things destroy candidates:
Barack Obama received 17 parking tickets while he was at Harvard between 1988 and 1991. He paid them in 2007, back when reporters started digging into these small things.

Barack Obama was admitted to the Illinois Bar in December of 1991 and had to answer, on his bar application, "Do you have any outstanding parking violations?"

What did he say then? By 2007, he claimed to have totally forgotten about the tickets. Did he forget in 1991 or just decide it was no big deal.

Descent of St Obama

The descent of St Barack, the Glow in Glowbama is wearing thin: "Barack Obama, the Different Kind of Presidential Candidate, has begun his metamorphosis into the same old kind of presidential candidate by backing away from his earlier promise to accept public financing."

Obama is a Hanuman idol worshipper.

Mike Klonsky, another communist friend of Obama: "Mike Klonsky is one of the founders of Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist) (USA) and the Students for a Democratic Society a fervent Obama supporter, friend and former member of the terrorist group the Weatherman."

"However, it must be pointed out that a notorious ally of Bill Ayers for many years, Mike Klonsky, is an open member of the Obama campaign. Klonsky runs a blog on the official Obama website Here where he claims to be a "professor of education" (the website of the Small Schools Workshop that he directs says only that he teaches some graduate courses, though it appears he was a visiting professor for one year at Nova Southeastern University in Florida in 2006-07) and says he blogs for Obama on "education politics and teaching for social justice."

Who is Mike Klonsky? Well, on one level, he might just appear to be a protege of Bill Ayers in the education world. He received, as I detail below, a $175,000 grant from the Ayers/Obama-led Annenberg Challenge to run the Small Schools Workshop that he and Ayers started in Chicago to push their school reform agenda."

Obama - Outside the American Experience

Via
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/obamas_lack_of_ordinary_modest.html,
a summation of the life of Obama:

As Victor Davis Hanson pointed out, Obama spent the first eighteen years of his life outside of the continental United States. He doesn't know this country very well at all. (Hawaii is another-worldly place to grow up in, as is Indonesia, compared to Indiana or Georgia.) Then he entered the unreal Ivory Tower of American colleges, followed by twenty years of weekly indoctrination lectures by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and his buds in the Black Liberation Theology political ideology. That's Obama's life to date. Obama's total experience at the national level of American politics comes down to two-plus years in the US Senate, most of which was spent campaigning for president.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

An Old Obama promise is like Sour Milk

... it needs to be thrown away.

NRO campaign spot says:

All Obama Promises Expire. It's Just a Question of When.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton on October 24, 2007: “To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies.”

Barack Obama, June 20, 2008: “Given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program.”

All Barack Obama statements come with an expiration date. All of them.

20 Reasons

20 Reasons Why I Can t Vote for Obama
with facts, figures, and references
By Charles Meek
1. Barack Hussein Obama has been objectively rated the single most liberal member of the
US Senate 100th out of 100. Is this just so many words, or does it mean something?
Well, let s take a look.
2. Obama has promised the abortion industry that the first piece of legislation he will sign
is the Freedom of Choice Act. This act would overturn every piece of state or federal
legislation that puts any reasonable restriction on abortion. For example, it would
overturn partial birth abortion restrictions , abortions after viability, abortions after the
baby has a heartbeat and fingerprints, parental consent legislation, health and safety
rules for abortion clinics, and required education and waiting periods for women
wanting abortions. This is no longer merely a religious issue. Because science has
allowed us to see the unborn baby in the womb (and doctors are now operating on
unborn babies under 22 weeks of age), there is even now an emerging pro-life atheist
movement. And it is no longer a Republican issue as many Democrats in the Congress
are now pro-life and the majority of Americans want reasonable restrictions on
abortion. Obama s views are ghastly and out of the mainstream.
3. Obama has a dangerously naïve view of the War on Terror. His approach is to pull out of
Iraq immediately and focus our attention on prosecuting terrorists through the courts.
Think about this. We only get the opportunity to prosecute terrorists through the courts
after they have committed an act of terror, and then only if we can catch them.
Prosecuting the terrorists who committed the World Trade Center bombings did not
prevent 9/11. One of the masterminds of the World Trade Center bombing who avoided
the law was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_Shaikh_Mohammed). He became the principle architect of
the 9/11 attacks and several other terrorist acts. While none of us like the war in Iraq,
the facts are clear: President Bush has prevented further terrorist attacks on our soil for
7 years. As Ann Coulter said, Produce one person who believed, on Sept. 12, 2001, that
there would not be another attack for 7 years, and I ll consider downgrading Bush from
Great to Really Good . During the War on Terror, some 20,000 terrorists have been
killed and so will never be able to hit us on our own streets or in our malls and office
buildings. And our military has kept a lot more of them pinned down in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Meanwhile, if Obama were to surrender in Iraq, the terrorists would re-
gain their momentum. The logic seems undeniable that our risk would escalate. My
professional life has focused a lot on RISK. This is not fear-mongering. To elect Barak
Obama would be a change that would be very risky.
4. Obama said he would meet without pre-conditions with Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad), a man who has vowed to
obliterate Israel. This may sound reasonable to some, but again it is a dangerously naïve
view of the War on Terror. Prior to World War II, British Prime Minister Neville
Chamberlain (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_Chamberlain) took a similar approach to
Hitler. At the time, Hitler s position of authority was weak as he was appointed
Chancellor while his Nazi party only had 37% of the votes. Chamberlain s visit to Hitler in
Germany strengthened Hitler s prestige and power and this policy of appeasement
ultimately weakened the Allies preparedness. Even Obama s Democrat opponent
Hillary Clinton warned against Obama s approach to appeasement of this extraordinarily
dangerous Iranian leader. Obama must be criticized for not learning from history.
5. Obama has a utopian view of evil, similar to others on the far left. He thinks that we can
just all be nice guys and get along. All of history proves this to be wrong. The great
American leaders have had one thing in common the willingness to stand boldly
against evil. Think of George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, and
Ronald Reagan. Barack Obama would sell the American soul to the forces of evil in a
utopian dream. The danger of this cannot be overstated.
6. On the economy, Barack Obama simply does not understand basic economics. For
example, he favors a windfall profits tax on oil companies. Look, the more you tax
something, the less of it you get. We need MORE oil not less. Jimmy Carter tried an
excess profits tax with devastating effects (http://www.taxhistory.org). It didn t work
then, and it won t work now. Carter s experiment stopped domestic energy exploration
and made America more dependent on foreign sources of oil. And why would Obama
single out the oil industry? The facts are that the oil companies make about 8.3 cents in
gross profit per dollar of sales. This is far below many other industries for example,
electronics companies make about 14.5 cents per dollar of sales. Oil and gas companies
made $86.5 billion in profits in 2007; at the same time, the financial services industry
made $498.5 billion. Obama is pushing nonsense.
7. There is no quick fix for high gasoline prices. But if the Congress had acted in the 1990 s
to spur oil production, we would not be in the fix we are today. The fact is inescapable
that liberal Democrats are squarely responsible for blocking all initiatives at a
comprehensive energy plan. I am tired of obstructionists stopping America from moving
forward on energy. We are producing no more oil domestically now than in 1948! We
need to move forward NOW to open drilling with modern environmental safeguards.
We need nuclear energy, more coal, more natural gas, and more oil. We need to open
the door to offshore drilling, onshore shale oil, and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
(ANWR). By the way, ANWR is a frozen tundra with no trees or rivers. The liberals (i.e.
Obama and Company) consistent blocking of development there is based on false
utopian ideas of pristine wilderness. Not only are these ideas false, oil development of
the region would not spoil what is there. Development of ANWR will impact only about
2,000 acres of the 19.9 million acre refuge. Even the residents of the area support
drilling there (http://www.anwr.org/people/people.htm). We heard that the Alaska
pipeline would decimate the caribou; but the caribou are thriving where the pipeline
runs. Obama s response to cries for help from the American people about $4 gasoline is
a deafening silence. Where is the leadership on this key issue from this man? (If he
caves on this between now and the election, it is clear that it is only because of public
outcry.) There is no sense hoping for conservation to solve the problem. We are in a
new era of demand from emerging nations that will overwhelm efforts at conservation.
While the deepening American recession may drop oil prices in the short run, we should
not let any such drop slow our efforts at a comprehensive energy policy.
8. The ultra-environmentalists want to focus all their attention on wind and solar. Great.
Let s go for it. But it cannot solve all our problems. I have extensive personal knowledge
of wind and solar. Because of unique circumstances, my wife and I have to rely on a
solar/wind installation for 100% of our power for our rural Texas home. I can tell you
that off-grid power is so expensive that it will never pay for itself, no matter how high
the price of grid power gets. And it is incredibly wasteful of resources. Environmental
religionists conveniently ignore how much fossil fuel energy it took to mine the lead in
our necessary 48 battery bank (each battery weighs 200 pounds) not to mention the
fossil fuels expended in constructing the building to house the batteries, the resources
to produce the solar panels or the large back-up generator to provide power (when
there is inadequate sun and the batteries are depleted). We are so green we are in the
red. By the way, I am as much of an environmentalist as the next guy. I have worked to
pass environmental legislation in our area. I am enough of an economist to understand
that when there are spillover costs (pollution), the government has a legitimate role to
play. But the problem with extreme environmental positions is that they go beyond
science to a utopian philosophy which pits capitalism against environmentalism. This
ultimately harms not only all of us but the environment as well. It is no accident that the
country with the best environmental record is the USA, which happens to be the beacon
of capitalism.
9. As a Christian, I feel a sense of responsibility to be a good steward to what God has
given us. But Jesus principle commands are to love God and serve our fellow man; there
is no mention in the Bible of worshipping a Mother Earth. By the way, it should be noted
that the no-energy-policy-global-warmist approach is anti-poor. The poorer one is the
more ultra-environmentalism damages the family budget. See
http://www.gerrycharlottephelps.com/2008/06/core-says-globa.html. Where is
Obama s sensitivity on this? Well, Ok. I ll give him credit for not being uncaring toward
the poor, so he must just be ignorant of this effect.
10. Here s the way I see the ultra-environmentalist movement. When its proponents are
unwilling to listen to contrary evidence, it ceases to be science. There is plenty of
contrary evidence against Al Gore s thesis. But it is accepted by many on faith in the face
of evidence against it. Ultra-environmentalism is a fundamentalist religion. And Obama
is a priest of its dogma.
11. Obama said that small-town Americans cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people
who aren t like them out of bitterness over lost jobs. I must say, this statement stunned
me. I was beginning to have some suspicions about who Obama really is, and this
confirmed it for me. Those who say that he is a liberal elitist have evidence to back it up.
Such comments are especially telling coming from a man who claims to be bringing
Americans together. I m proud to have friends from all socio-economic levels and am
concerned that a President Obama would push this country further in the direction of
the two Americas of John Edwards and Howard Dean. This is not healthy. I want to see
America ONE Nation under God again, fighting shoulder-to-shoulder against evil and
toward noble shared goals such as going to the moon and energy independence.
12. A bit more on this two Americas notion. Have you noticed how some liberals though
certainly not all tend to vilify successful men and institutions? I don t think I have to
name names of those on the receiving end of this hatred. If I am wrong, none will come
to mind. If I am right, many will come to mind. But I will mention one group
evangelical Christians, of whom I am one. Never in my life have I seen this group
experience such disdain. The idea of tolerance from liberals stops here. I m sure that
when people figure out that I believe that Christianity is true all of it that my
arguments in this essay will be rejected out of hand, no matter how reasonable. I
welcome the other side s views if they can back them up with reason and evidence. But I
don t think this openness comes back the other way. Thus the times we live in.
13. And what of this Rev. Jeremiah Wright association? Along with Rev. Wright s hateful
comments about the America I love we note Michelle Obama s comments about how
she has never before been proud of her country. It seems that Senator Obama lives in a
world of hatred and distrust toward America. How can we expect to get anything better
if he is President?
14. In a Wall Street Journal interview, Senator Obama discussed his view that we are in a
winner take all economy, in which the gains from economic growth skew heavily
toward the wealthy. Actually, I have some sympathies for this view. I am inclined to
agree that corporate CEO s, as a group, are overpaid. But I disagree with the one-sided
generalization Obama makes. To a very real degree, when the companies large and
small thrive, so does the entire economy. Obama s idea of boilerplate redistribution of
wealth is pure socialism. His attack on the successful is not justice. It is theft! I want to
see leaders that encourage every American to work hard and make personal and family
decisions that improve their chance of success, rather than preaching negativism that
success is beyond their control because of race, class, poverty, etc. As Cal Thomas says
(http://www.calthomas.com/index.php?news=2294), America once was a country of
overcomers. Today, we are not about overcoming. The successful are not studied to see
how they succeeded. Their stories of overcoming obstacles are not told, at least in their
totality. If they are told at all, it is just the success and wealth part, not the part about
how they got there .Obama s economic doctrine subsidizes people who make wrong
decisions and does little to encourage them to make right ones.
15. Obama says he won t raise taxes on the middle class. That s going to be a pretty hard
promise to keep, given his list of new programs including government subsidies for free
college, social security, health care, etc. While I am fed up with Democrat s and
Republican s continued failure to balance the budget, I have more hope for Obama s
opponent than for Obama. John McCain has been a long time champion against pork
barrel spending. He is unusual in that he has never garnered any pork for his own state.
When he says that he will veto bills with pork in them, I m inclined to believe him. I m
very uneasy about Senator Obama s ability to pull off a change in Washington to
balance the budget.
16. I m frazzled about Obama s socialization of America. The comments Obama has made
about ignoring the Constitution are alarming:
http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/20/obama-the-living-constitution-and-the-
socialization-of-america/. His stated criterion for appointing judges is that they have
empathy. Good night, nurse! The President of the United States does not promise to
uphold empathy but to uphold the Constitution!
17. Obama is proving to be a flipper in the vein of John Kerry. He has changed his mind on
Iraq, campaign finance, NAFTA, corporate tax rates, and Social Security:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=298769662128800. What next? He
seems to be for change all right for changing his mind.
18. Obama supports gay marriage. Goodness knows that Americans come down on
different sides of this issue. But whenever it goes before a vote of the people,
Americans usually vote 2 to 1 against gay marriage. Obama wants to appoint judges that
will force gay marriage on us. This whole debate is based on the idea that some people
are born gay. That idea has no basis in science. The real problem for those in a
homosexual lifestyle is not discrimination, but rather physical devastation
(http://www.familyresearchinst.org/). This lifestyle has much greater statistical
incidence of disease and addiction. In fact, the best evidence we have on it indicates
that the life expectancy of homosexuals is 20 to 30% shorter than others, not even
accounting for AIDS. The real bottom line is surprisingly simple: Every child has the right
to a mother and a father. Statistics confirm that children do much better in a traditional
family. The definition of marriage as between one man and one woman is rightly
discriminatory for children in family formation. While there may be more research left
to be done, let s allow the people to decide how they want marriage to be defined in
this country.
19. Obama s solution to everything is to have government tax it or nationalize it. This is Big
Brother on Steroids. Maybe change means that we can emulate great societies like,
well, Venezuela.
20. Obama is the most inexperienced person to run for President in my lifetime. Even he has
admitted that his experience makes him unqualified:
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/06/barack-obama-says-he-is-not-
experienced.html.

Monday, June 23, 2008

NOBAMA NATION

This site is very impressive! Nobama Network. Links galore to Nobama sites and anti-Obama information and sites, inspired by the pro-Hillary "PUMA" movement (Party Unity My Ass=PUMA), that is morphing into 'Democrats for McCain'.

Obama Supporter Lashes Out

Got this in the inbox:
Shut the fuck up *******. Your Mr. McCain is an old fat fuck cancer face flip flopping republican bitch! McCain = McBush!

Nothing can stand in the way of the power of millions of voices calling for change!

Obama, the politics of hate just swirls around him doesn't it?

Here's what makes their heads explode - the truth!

Obama is a lying, plagiarizing, flipflopping, elitist, arrogant, leftwing socialist with poor judgment and radical extremist friends and associates, including the racist pastor Rev Wright, who he called his friend and mentor for 20 years. Obama will hurt our economy with his higher taxes, hurt our culture with pro-abortion extremism and racial grievance politics, and get Americans killed with his naive and weak foreign policy.

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Obama at the Movies

Obama YouTube
Obama's Votes and Record
Obama's dancing around on the issues
Hannity on Obama's record: Accidently voted wrong 6 times; voted present 130 times; did things that showed he was 'politically ambitious'.
Obama's sick voting record
Obama's voting record
Partial Birth Abortion (graphic).
Also, Mad World of Barack Obama on infanticide.
Barack Obama lied about his accomplishments and about not taking lobbyist money.
Obama too busy running for President TO DO HIS JOB AS SENATOR! - failed to hold Afghanistan hearings.
Obama full of it - says Iran too small to threaten us!
Obama and Iran - Great video that ties
Obama on taxes - get your hands out of my pocket!
Obama is for sex education for kindergarteners. Idiot.
The Friend - Obama introduces his friend, Rev Jeremiah Wright.
Obama and Rezko and Auchi, the Iraqi go-between to Saddam.
"I won't wear that pin on my chest" - Obama
Is Obama Wright? - Pastor Jeremiah Wright & Senator Barack and Michelle. A medley.
Rev Wright rants
Obama lies on "The View", Morning Joe review
"I dont think this church is particularly controversial" - "an occassionally fierce critic" - Obama listened to tapes, used a Wright sermon as a source for his convention speech. Yet he claims to have not heard Rev Wrights comments! Comment: It's like going to a KKK meeting for 20 years and claiming your not racist.
Obama plagiarizes Edwards
Obama plagiarizes Deval Patrick
"For the first time I am proud of my country" - Michelle Obama
Michelle Obama wants to take your piece of the pie
Obama lies about the 100 years in Iraq


More Barack Obama youTube videos







Sowell on Obama

Irrelevent Apologies


Despite clever spin from Obama's supporters about avoiding "guilt by association," much more is involved than casual association with people like Jeremiah Wright and Father Pfleger.

In addition to giving $20,000 of his own money to Jeremiah Wright, as a state senator Obama directed $225,000 of the Illinois taxpayers' money for programs run by Father Pfleger. In the U.S. Senate, Obama earmarked $100,000 in federal tax money for Father Pfleger's work. Giving someone more than 300 grand is not just some tenuous, coincidental association.

Are Barack Obama's views shown by what he says during an election year or by what he has been doing for decades before?

Despots for Obama

North Korea's leader joins list of rogue dictators favoring Obama's win:

North Korea prefers Democratic candidate Barack Obama over Republican John McCain, a pro-Pyongyang newspaper in Japan said.
The communist country, which has survived a relatively hawkish Bush administration, considers McCain “a variant of Bush” and “nothing better than a scarecrow of neoconservatives,” according to the Choson Sinbo, a newspaper run by ethnic Koreans in Japan. The organization of Koreans, called Chongryon, has served as Pyongyang’s de facto embassy in Japan, which has no diplomatic ties with North Korea. ...

Pyongyang favors Obama because he has vowed to meet leaders of rogue states, such as the North Korean leader, without conditions if elected.

Malkin calls it the Ultimate Endorsement and notes its a Hatrick - Castro, Qadafi and RPNK's Kim Jong Il.


European allies worry obama's Iran policy will hurt us all and encourage Iran to continue developing nuclear weapons.

Obama's Fundraising

"Obama's money raising operation is unpresedented and it's grass roots."

Not like you think. Sen. Obama said recently that 90% of his donations are from small donors, which is half-true at best. 90% of the people who donated to his campaign are small donors, but the money they sent only makes up 36% of the money he has raised. Think about that.

Oh, yeah, and he has 14 of those "evil" lobbyists acting as "bundlers" for his campaign funds.

Refusing money from Washington lobbyists and PACs alone is an illusion if underneath there is not consistency.

Just today:

Wall Street and the banking sector have given $19 million to Obama compared with $12 million to McCain through the end of May, according the Center for Responsive Politics and Federal Election Commission. Hedge funds, mortgage lenders, investment banks and private equity firms, which have been hit by the subprime mortgage and housing market crisis, are included in that group.

The trend holds true for a number of other industries, which are contributing more campaign funds to Obama, but flips on a few other business sectors:

- Communications, electronics and technology: Obama, $10.2 million; McCain $2.3 million.

- Construction: Obama, $2.1 million; McCain, $1.8 million.

- Health care, drug companies: Obama, $6.6 million; McCain, $2.5 million.

- Transportation: McCain, $988,000; Obama, $609,000.

- Energy: McCain, $1.4 million; Obama, $1.1 million.

- Agriculture: McCain, $1 million; Obama, $834,000.

Barack Obama often boasts he is “the only candidate who isn’t taking a dime from Washington lobbyists,” yet his fundraising team includes 38 members of law firms that were paid $138 million last year to lobby the federal government, records show.

Those lawyers, including 10 former federal lobbyists, have pledged to raise at least $3.5 million for the Illinois senator’s presidential race. Employees of their firms have given Obama’s campaign $2.26 million, a USA TODAY analysis of campaign-finance data shows.

Thirty-one of the 38 are law firm partners, who typically receive a share of their firms’ lobbying fees. At least six of them have some managerial authority over lobbyists.

“It makes no difference whether the person is a registered lobbyist or the partner of a registered lobbyist, if the person is raising money to get access or curry favor,” said Michael Malbin, director of the Campaign Finance Institute, a non-partisan think tank.

Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor said that while Obama’s refusal to take money from lobbyists “isn’t a perfect solution … it does reflect Obama’s record of trying to change the way that Washington does business.” He declined to elaborate.

http://www.usatoday.com/...

Here’s another, going back to the start:

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) is benefiting from the support of well-connected Washington lobbyists even though he has prohibited his campaign from accepting contributions from them and political action committees (PACs).

While Obama has decried the influence of special interests in Washington, the reality is that many of the most talented and experienced political operatives in his party are lobbyists, and he needs their help.

Mike Williams, the director of government relations at Credit Suisse Securities, said of the network of lobbyists supporting Obama: “I would imagine that it’s as large as the Clinton list,” in reference to rival presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), who is an entrenched favorite of the Washington Democratic establishment.

He said that while lobbyists cannot give money to Obama, they can give “policy” and “campaign support.” Indeed, K Street denizens have rare policy and national campaign expertise.

Williams is actively building support for Obama among lobbyists and the corporate clients they represent. While other Obama supporters have described him as a leading activist, Williams demurs: “I wouldn’t want to put my position as a spearhead.” He acknowledges that the gains Obama is making among Washington’s Democratic establishment are hard to see because Obama’s K Street supporters have kept a low profile. As a result, Obama’s K Street network is a stealthy operation.

http://thehill.com/...

My problem has always been the fact that he creates a different impression when he is just more of the same. It’s easy to discover with simple inquiry.

Lefty Puts Lipstick on that Possum

David Brooks lets the 'other' Obama that has peeked through Obamessiah. And the Left is starting to notice.


Obama team to play pro-abort card

The Plan all along was to play the Roe-v-Wade card:
The SCOTUS, Roe v. Wade and women’s issues was the BO campaigns “ace in the hole” according to Chuck Todd from MSNBO network. The BO spokesperson told Todd that they would use any means necessary to beat Hillary and if women were offended, they would come back to the party during the GE because their plan was to “play the Roe v. Wade card.” THAT is a direct quote from the BO campaign via Todd.
Yes, I can see it now: "Vote for me, I'm the pro-abortion extremist!"

Really, now. Are all women Democrats so gung ho for abortion and partial birth abortion and taxpayer funding of abortion and even Obama's opposition to an bill outlawing infanticide of born-alive victims of botched abortions, they will toss overboard concerns about Obama's judgment, experience, campaign tricks, and dishonest rhetoric. They will ignore that womens issues are a lot broader than killing a fetus?

Hmmmmm. Hear those PUMAs out there?

Obama Helps Barrow (GA-12 Congresscritter)

Another case of political expediency trumping positions:

Despite all of this, The Atlanta Constitution-Journal reported yesterday that Barack Obama — who has been claiming to be so emphatically opposed to warrantless eavesdropping and telecom amnesty, to say nothing of the Iraq War — taped a radio endorsement this week for Rep. Barrow, with the specific intent to help him defeat Regina Thomas in the Democratic primary (h/t sysprog):

Obama cuts an ad to help John Barrow in his primary fight

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama has taped a radio commercial on behalf of U.S. Rep. John Barrow of Savannah, who faces a July 15 primary challenge.

It’s the first case of Obama involving himself in a local race in Georgia. . . But the Obama campaign made clear to my colleague Aaron Sheinin that it sees Barrow, a two-term Democrat, as an important ally. . . .

“Senator Obama believes that Congressman Barrow has worked hard to bring change that families in his district deserve, and we’ll work hard to help John Barrow win in November,” Obama spokeswoman Amy Brundage said.

In the ad, Obama asks voters to join him in supporting Barrow. “We’re going to need John Barrow back in Congress to help change Washington and get our country back on track,” Obama says in the 60-second ad.

The article highlighted the reason Barrow was so eager to have Obama record an ad endorsing him and why it’s so potentially important in helping Barrow win his primary:

Barrow beat a Republican incumbent in 2004 and had tough GOP opposition in 2006. But this April, Barrow picked up unexpected opposition from Regina Thomas, a well-known African-American state senator based in Savannah. Barrow is white, and in past primaries in the 12th District, black voters have cast nearly 70 percent of the ballots.

What makes this even more amazing is that, as the article notes, Barrow cynically waited until after Obama’s sweeping primary victory in Georgia to endorse him. He did so only once he saw that Obama would likely be the nominee and obviously with the hope of having Obama encourage Barrow’s sizable African-American constituency to support him. And now Obama turns around and intervenes in a Democratic primary on behalf of one of the worst Bush enablers in Congress — not in order to help Barrow defeat an even-worse Republican, but to defeat a far better and plainly credible Democratic challenger.

Obama Jumps the Shark



Source: RezkoWatch

"Looks like the progressives are finally starting to wake up and smell the disillusionment. ... I wonder how the Obots will respond to this cartoon? They'll probably call the caricature "racist." That trick always works."—Joseph Cannon, Cannonfire, 06/21/08.

Obama’s arrogance is beyond belief. I just pray that the American people will see him for the lying, elitist, inexperienced, anti-American, Hamas-supportive, self-centered, self-glorifying and condescending snob that he is. There is no issue, no endorsement, no media, no extreme makeover and no propaganda that could ever make me vote for Obama.

Obama's despicable "you're a racist" attack

Obama "despicable" says Hewitt:
"Barack Obama's attribution to John McCain and the GOP of the intention to use racist appeals in the campaign ahead is despicable."


That it is. And it's a bit early in the game to be playing the racist card. Obama: "He’s young and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?"

Now, since when is calling out Obama's lack of experience an illegitimate issue? And who's fearmongering and casting more aspersions now? It's Obama more than anyone else who keeps injecting race into the Presidential contest.

One comment puts it: "Obama has been playing the race card since day one. He keeps pretending everyone else is the racist when it is HE who is the biggest racist of all."

Indeed. His racist afrocentric Black Liberation Theology church that he attended for 20 years has more hate and venom based on race than anyone else out there. Pot calls kettle, er, um, never mind that analogy, it will probably be called racist too.

OBAMA LIED, CREDIBILITY DIED.

Here is why Obama's broken promise on campaign funding is a big deal: It emphatically destroys Obama's claim to be anything but another lying politician.

It's about the lying and dishonesty. OBAMA LIED, CREDIBILITY DIED.
Obama's campaign is a tissue of lies built on dishonesty about who he is (he's a leftist not a centrist), what kind of politician he is (he is a race-baiting Chicago-style kneecapping finger-in-wind pol, not a post-racial messianic wunderkind), and who's on his side (Soros, the moveon.org leftist nutroots and Hollywood lib millionaires, not everyman contributors).
Obama made a commitment in Nov 2007 to use public financing. He broke that promise. Then in June 2008 when breaking his promise he lied about his opponent, he lied about making efforts that were not made. OBAMA LIED, CREDIBILITY DIED.

The shocker is the OBAMEDIA is in the tank for Obama so much that when the curtain is lifted, they pretend not to notice, knowing they are in on the farce. THEY KNOW ITS A SCAM AND DONT CARE. They never cared enough to report on Obama's real past, they've
covered up his gaffes, etc. Obamedia are willing to take a bullet of credibility 'for the team' and cover up this blatant broken promise.

Obama plays the VRWC Card

"Well, Sunlen, you and I both know that 527s pop up pretty quickly and have enormous influence and we’ve seen them. There was an ad, one in South Dakota, by Floyd Brown, I think, where it took a speech that I had made extolling faith and made it seem as if I had said that America was a Muslim nation. We’ve already seen attacks on my wife from, you know, the Tennessee Republican Party. I don’t think that I am off the wall here to say that, you know, a lot of outside groups are potentially going to be going after us hard."

Obama makes mountains out of molehills: If there is a single ad against him out there,
it means the VRWC is out to get him. Who's the fearmongerer? Obama, that's who. "Boo, there's a rightwinger in your inbox!"

Saturday, June 21, 2008

"Velcro Possum" Obama expropriates President's Seal

Obama uses Presidential-like Logo for his podium.



Ah, the ARROGANCE ! He's already president, see! He's decided to skip the job interview and figures to even question him is to be a racist hack. "Vero Possumus"? They put "Yes, we can" into latin - actually it sounds like "Velcro Possum" and yes we've had our Teflon President, BUT THIS MAN IS A VELCRO POSSUM!

The Hype and Chains candidate will be the Velcro Possum from here on out, the arrogant elitist flip-flopping leftwing inexperienced junior Senator with bad judgement and a dishonest campaign.

Pejman Yousefzadeh opines:

Consider me officially gobsmacked. Bear in mind that all of this means (a) someone proposed this idea to the top levels of the Obama campaign, (b) the top levels of the Obama campaign agreed that it was a good idea, (c) the candidate himself may have had a hand in designing and
tweaking the logo, (d) someone with a knowledge of Latin was sought out in order to translate "Yes, We Can" into the language of the Caesars (repeat that last bit to yourself a time or two to grasp the full significance of how important this matter apparently was to the Obama campaign) and (e) there was no one in the campaign who perhaps nervously cleared his or her throat and piped up with the words "um . . . folks, given all of our concerns about the Imperial Presidency, as articulated during the Bush-Cheney Administration, doesn't anyone else think that it might be . . . er . . . well . . . a little hypocritical for us to be doing this kind of thing?"

What Barack Obama could learn from King Canute has already been noted, but not only has the Obama campaign refused to take note of Canute's modesty, they have transcended their earlier acts of grandiosity (the waters are really going to stop rising because Barack Obama won the Democratic Presidential nomination?) with an act that reveals just how much the Obama campaign resembles a cult of personality. ...

Relatedly, John McCormack notes that technically, the Davids Axelrod and Plouffe may be risking a stiff fine or a prison sentence. Of course, this will never happen but I can easily find that the Obama campaign has "reproduce[d]" a "likeness of the seals of the President or Vice President, or any substantial part thereof" for a purpose not pertaining to "the official use of the Government of the United States."

UPDATE: Found here - NYT blog: "The country is now known as the United States of Obamerica. " The Obamedia will make sure we know how to worship the new Obamessiah.

UPDATE: It's against the law:
18 USC 713: Use of likenesses of the great seal of the United States, the seals of the President and Vice President, the seal of the United States Senate, the seal of the United States House of Representatives, and the seal of the United States Congress.

UPDATE: NextRight commentater says vero possumus looks like "ZERO POSSIBILITIES" Riverdaughter comment says: "I think Vero Possumus, loosely translated, means “lipstick on a possum”

Another view
Edgeofforever
got this from the LA Times - "The possum speaks truthily."
And it's got olive branches, which stand for peace, which we haven't really had since 9/11 but DailyKos promises will come as soon as we shoo out Bush and Cheney.

The seal's also got a terrifically impressive motto in Latin -- "Vero Possumus" -- which means "The possum speaks truthily."

No, just kidding. It actually means "Truly we're able," which translates as "Si se puede," which translates as "Yes, we can." Obama is clearly copying George W. Bush's Texas gubernatorial reelection motto from 1998.

Plus it's got Obama's website right up there too. Lord knows, he needs more donations because the poor White Sox fan from Chicago's impoverished South Side has only raised a little under $290 million so far.

As chronicled by our colleagues over at the Swamp, some folks figure he'll top a half-billion dollars before election day, now that he's scrapped his promise to take public funds, this year a measly $84 million to spend between Labor Day and Nov. 4. Public money was good enough for every other presidential candidate for the last three decades. But how could any serious candidate possibly get along on only $1.3 million a day?

During the Democratic primary voting, a lot of folks were fooled into thinking Obama agreed with public funds when he signed a pledge last fall to use them and told constitutents before that, "If we're still getting financed primarily from individual contributions, those with the most money are still going to have the most influence."

As Jill Zuckman notes in the Swamp, the John McCain camp is using Obama's own phrase -- "Don't tell me words don't matter" -- to skewer the Illinois senator on his finance reversal.

An improvement to the logo has been made:

Obama's Childish foreign Policy

Kristol dissects Obama's foreign policy:

"Winnie-the-Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security."
--former Navy Secretary Richard Danzig, one of Barack Obama's key foreign policy advisers, June 11

Obama's messiah complex and thin skin

Obama smears his opponents - ""They're going to try to make you afraid of me. He's young and inexperienced and he's got a funny name. And did I mention he's black?"


Yes, how dare the Republicans point out that Obama is naive, foolish and wrong on how to deal with terrorist. Yes, how dare the Republicans point out that Obama's economic policies will make us poorer. Yes, how dare the Republicans point out that Obama has a lifelong history of leftwing activism, but has done nothing of patriotic service (military or otherwise) for the nation.



This ad that challenges Barack on his "Messiah" complex


Obama caves on FISA, gives nutroots a goose egg

Says Stop the ACLU viewing the NutRoots Left reaction to the FISA bill:
"And where the fuck is Obama on this? Talk about missing in action.
If he doesn’t do anything to stop this going through the Senate, I’m going to be really pissed off."

Obama, via TPM, comes out and deflates all the "hope" for "change":
"So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as President, I will carefully monitor the program, review the report by the Inspectors General, and work with the Congress to take any additional steps I deem necessary to protect the lives - and the liberty - of the American people."

Leftie blogger reaction: "Obama earns a Wanker of the Day from Atrios. And it's well-deserved. I thought he'd issue some vague statement of disapproval and then miss the vote. This endorsement of a X'ing out the Fourth Amendment is waaaay out of bounds."

American Thinker has more on Obama's pre-cave - the Dems gave him a few days to figure out his position.

Obamedia in Illinois

He's been here so he's gets a vote. "It is so bad, so pointless, so filled with empty platitudes and meaninglessness that one might suspect it was written by Barack Obama himself instead of a reputed journalist. But it is a perfect example of the sort of slavish devotion the Illinois press is bestowing on it’s almost native son."

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi says Obama has "inferiority complex"

Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi: Obama Suffers Inferiority Complex That Might Make Him Behave "Whiter Than the White." He Should Be Proud of His African, Muslim Identity. Ben-Gurion Gave the Green Light for the Killing of JFK :

Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by Libyan Leader Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi marking the anniversary of the U.S. air raid on Libya. The address aired on Al-Jazeera TV on June 11, 2008:

There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama. All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency.

But we were taken by surprise when our African Kenyan brother, who is an American national, made statements that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world, in Africa, and in the Islamic world. We hope that this is merely an elections "clearance sale," as they say in Egypt – in other words, merely an elections lie. As you know, this is the farce of elections – a person lies and lies to people, just so that they will vote for him, and afterwards, when they say to him: :"You promised this and that," he says: "No, this was just elections propaganda." This is the farce of democracy for you. He says: "This was propaganda, and you thought I was being serious. I was fooling you to get your votes."

Allah willing, it will turn out that this was merely elections propaganda. Obama said he would turn Jerusalem into the eternal capital of the Israelis. This indicates that our brother Obama is ignorant of international politics, and is not familiar with the Middle East conflict.

We still hope that this black man will take pride in his African and Islamic identity...

Aadafi speech

First Ad: Hype and Chains Obama Lies Again

Here's the script: "OBAMA: I’m Barack Obama. America is a country of strong families and strong values. My life’s been blessed by both. I was raised by a single mom and my grandparents."

His Dad went back to Kenya to be a polygamist and abuse later spouses. His Mom remarried
a Muslim who took him to Indonesia. Then she came back to Hawaii and gave him to grandparents to raise.

"We didn’t have much money, but they taught me values straight from the Kansas heartland where they grew up."
Barack Obama did not set foot anywhere near Kansas his entire life. Those values included inculcating Barack with Communist, Socialist and leftist sensibilities.
Barack didn't go to public school, but to an exclusive private school. Not much money?

"Accountability and self-reliance."
- Learning to smoke pot in his exclusive Private School in Hawaii
- Disowning racist pastors

" Love of country."
- Not wearing the flag ping because you don't like the patriots who do
- Attending a Black Liberation Theology church that attacks the US as built on "White man's greed"

" Working hard without making excuses."
- Making excuses for lying about his campaign finance flipflop
- His feeble excuses over Trinity church (I wasn't there when he preached hate, etc)
- Making more excuses when he had to throw VP vetter Johnson under the bus

" Treating your neighbor as you’d like to be treated."
- bringing guns to knife fights (figuratively)
- getting other candidates off the ballots with subterfuges
- helping your neighbor Tony Rezko

"It’s what guided me as I worked my way up – taking jobs and loans to make it through college."
- Dont we all? Only obama can make the ordinary seem monumental

"It’s what led me to pass up Wall Street jobs and go to Chicago instead, helping neighborhoods devastated when steel plants closed."
- there is no record of him helping anybody in any consequential way, just hankering for a political career
-
"That’s why I passed laws moving people from welfare to work, cut taxes for working families"
- Liar, liar pants on fire. He's opposed tax cuts and voted for tax increases.
He's opposed real welfare reform.
- He was endorsed by the New Party, a socialist group

" and extended health care for wounded troops who’d been neglected.
"I approved this message because I’ll never forget those values, and if I have the honor of taking the oath of office as President, it will be with a deep and abiding faith in the country I love."
- This man has managed to surpass Bill Clinton on the dishonesty score

This Pandering Ad is a complete subterfuge. It is designed to hide, not highlight the real barack Obama.

UPDATE:
Obama's 3 points are lies:
"Obama makes three rather grand pronouncements in this ad. First of all he says he passed laws moving people from welfare to work. While this is the truest of the claims, he does seem to be pandering to a right-leaning audience. If any of you read my post on Clinton bashing, several commenters blasted Clinton for doing the same thing with his comprehensive welfare reform. Obama contradicts himself on the Clinton legacy as well. And while he claims to have moved people from “welfare to work” he was mostly interested in allowing convicted felons to continue to enroll in welfare programs:"

They note Obama OPPOSED welfare reform:
Obama: “I am not a defender of the status quo with respect to welfare. Having said that, I probably would not have supported the federal legislation, because I think it had some problems.” (Sen. Barack Obama, State Of Illinois 90th General Assembly Regular Session Senate Transcript, 5/31/97, www.ilga.gov, p. 42)

Obama take credit for an Illinois EITC tax credit program (ie income subsidies):
When Gov. Ryan Signed The Earned Income Tax Credit Into Law, He Credited Democrat Senate Leader Emil Jones With Its Passage. “Crediting Illinois Democratic Senate Leader Emil Jones with its passage, Gov. George Ryan Thursday [May, 11, 2000] signed the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) into law, which will put about $50 in the pockets of poor workers. In signing HB 3939, which amends the Illinois Income Tax Act that established the first EITC program for individuals, Ryan said this credit will be equal to five percent of the federal earned income tax credit for the years 2000-2002.”

Third took credit for something that he didn't even vote for and which was not contentious:

Obama Missed The Vote On The Defense Authorization Act, Which Passed By An Overwhelming Bipartisan Majority. (H.R. 4986, CQ Vote #1: Passed 91-3: R 46-0; D 44-2; I 1-1, 1/22/08, Obama Did Not Vote)

Obama Lied, Credibility Died

Obama breaks promise on public financing -
"We've made the decision not to participate in the public financing system for the general election,"

Flashback:
Obama: "Well, I strongly support public financing. And I know [Senator] Dick [Durbin] does too. He's going to have some things to say about it because when we were having - as you'll recall - the major debates around lobbying reform, one of the things that Dick, I think, properly pointed out was that you can change the rules on lobbying here in Washington, but if we're still getting financed primarily from individual contributions, that those with the most money are still going to have the most influence." (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks At Constituents Breakfast, 6/29/06)

"In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system "in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."

In November 2007, in a debate, Obama was asked:

If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?

OBAMA: Yes.

"I’m asking you to try to do something that’s never been done before. Declare our independence from a broken system, and run the type of campaign that reflects the grassroots values that have already changed our politics and brought us this far." - Obama today, doing the opposite of what he says he is doing and the opposite of what he says he would do.

UPDATE: SO the Obama campaign tries to make a virtue out of this egregious flip-flop.

"The system is broken" so we will be the biggest spenders ever. The absurdity and brazenness of the Obama campaign boldly breaking a promise and being outrageously rude about their moral superiority in doing so requires a riposte. So I complained to the stie administrator about the announcement:

"This announcement violates statements and promises made by Barack. This idiot must be fired!"

Unexamined Obama

The Unexamined (by Chicago Press) Obama

Hugh Hewitt - big Obama gaffes.

Obama's Control of Media Message

Obama controls media access:
According to the New York Times, the Obama campaign is tightening 'control of image and access' over the past few weeks in a clear attempt of prevent manipulate media coverage. On Monday in a meeting with African-American Civic the Obama campaign barred cameras from the meeting and recently refused to release the names of a group of religious figures Obama met with. According to the times report, the campaign went as far as providing a separate entrance to protect the identity and prevent press interviews of those in attendance. The new strategy has also resulted in this week's "head scarves" incident which has outraged much of the Muslim community; especially in light of the Obama's recent Jerusalem gaffe.

...
Obamas campaign strategists have defended the moves claiming that they believe they need to take extra steps to "prevent against attack". In reality, the measures are aimed at manipulating public perception.

The Times report was complimentary to the McCain campaigns stating "they still enjoy a reputation for giving reporters traveling with him an unusual amount of access." Again, a laughable irony considering that Obama expects the American people to view McCain as the typical politician in attempt to manipulate his 30 year record of bipartisanship.

The Obama campaign's new tactics are reminiscent of those used by the "propaganda ministries" of leaders of the past and those utilized by some of the most notorious "leaders" of today. The Obama campaign has become so afraid of Obama's gaffes, associations, and hypocritical statements that they now believe that Americans need to be told what issues and information are important and can be discussed. Sshhhh... Did anyone else just hear that crack in the foundation?

Obama Puts Muslim Pals In Back of Bus


The Obama campaign has Islamophobia. Apparently, having a muslim father, muslim step-father, muslim half-brothers and half-sister, and attending a muslim school and studying the Koran as a child for 2 years is such a deep dark secret that Obama has to bury it all behind the phony mask of "Obama is a Christian, end of story". (well, if that extremist anti-American Trinity church is "Christian" I may have to turn Buddhist in protest.)


Yet these adoring Muslims show up inconveniently. The campaign has decided they don't like Muslims in the same shot with Obama. Just like when they call for "more white folks" in their stage, this raises questions of Obama campaign practicing the kind of racial and sectarian animosity that they denounce - WDEF story:


When two young muslim women wearing headscarves, were told recently they could not sit behind Barack Obama at this rally......it raised questions in their community.
"It speaks towards a bigger issue as far as the pervasive Islam phobia that is in our society that two Muslim females would be turned away..."



Funny, but Obama wasn't afraid to stand with radical extremists like Rev Wright. He's not afraid to be the most liberal member of the U.S.Senate. So why isn't he willing to stand by Muslim supporters, who are legion and eager?


You see, the weaker the candidate, the more you have to stage-manage him, and this is the most stage-managed and phony candidate since 1992 if not before. The Muslim garb photo was worth a 3-day kerfuffle back in the heyday of the Clinton-Obama slugfest:




Meanwhile, Evangelist Challenges Barack Obama to explain his Christian faith. Pigs will fly before the stage-managed campaign would respond to that challenge.


This is yet another example of Obama cowardly throwing those people under the bus who are inconvenient to him gaining power.

Marxists Cheer Obama's Victory in Iowa

Letters: Jan. 12, 2008
>Archive - PWW Print Edition Archive - 2008 Editions - Jan. 12, 2008

Author: Readers
People’s Weekly World Newspaper, 01/10/08 14:40

Happy New Year and congratulations on a job well done. These have been trying times when the hyenas of war have again been turned loose on humanity by a greedy ruling class.

Now, beyond all the optimism I was capable of mustering, Mr. Obama won Iowa! He won in a political arena 95 percent white. It was a resounding defeat for the manipulations of the ultra-right and their right-liberal fellow travelers. Also it was a hard lesson for liberals who underestimated the political fury of the masses in these troubled times.

Obama’s victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle. Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary “mole,” not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through.

The old pattern of politics as usual has been broken. It may not have happened as we expected it to happen but what matters is that it happened. The message is clear: we can and must defeat the ultra-right, by uniting the broadest possible coalition that will represent an overwhelming majority of the people in a new political dynamic. We must quickly shed yesterday’s political perspective and get in step with the march of events.

Frank Chapman
Via e-mail

Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2033337/posts?page=6#6

Obamedia Bias

As extreme as it ever was:

From January 2007 through May 2007, Harvard, along with the Project for Excellence in Journalism (part of the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press), examined 1,742 presidential campaign stories. The stories appeared in 48 print, online, network TV, cable and radio news outlets. Their conclusion?

"Obama's front page coverage," said the study, "was 70 percent positive and 9 percent negative, and Clinton's was similarly 61 percent positive and 13 percent negative." For Republicans, however, only 25 percent of the stories had a positive tone, and 40 percent were negative. As for network TV newscasts, Democrats were positively portrayed more than twice as often as they were negatively. For Republicans, however, fewer than 20 percent of the stories were positive, with a negative tone twice as often.

Obama and Dont Drill Democrats Wrong on Energy

Dont Drive is not a solution. "When Barack Obama told a Pennsylvania audience this past weekend that "We can't drill our way out of this," he was repeating the same line that Nancy Pelosi used days earlier and that Harry Reid used on Wednesday."

Saying drilling wont solve the energy crisis so dont drill,
is like saying sandbags wont stop a flood so dont bother building levees.
It’s an absolutist and insanely illogical position.
Every little bit helps in the battle of supply and demand.

Democrats propose Socialism instead. Democrat Representative Maurice Hinchey stated that “we (the government) should own the refineries. Then we can control how much gets out into the market.”

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Kerry is Stuck In Iraq

"Kerry has the best credentials of any Senator on terrorism and has been the leader since 2005 on Iraq. "

Really? If this clueless dolt is the best the Democrats have to offer on Iraq and foreign policy then the Democrats have practically endorsed McCain.

Kerry, like his bad joke, is stuck in Iraq. The Democrats have painted themselves into a 'surge wont work' corner as the ducks finally line up to deliver stability and security in Iraq. Many mistakes were made by the Bush administration, but all along, the Democrats were there peddling defeatism and advice that was worse. Kerry said the elections wouldnt work - they did. Kerry (and Obama) said the surge wouldnt work - it did. Violence is down 75%. the Iraq security forces are now strong enough to tackle many challenges and keep getting stronger. We have gotten into a position where winning stability in Iraq is inevitable so long as we continue supporting the Iraqi govt in the next 1-2 years as it gets up to speed.

McCain is the one man whose advice and perspective has been vindicated by events. McCain was the one arguing with Rumsfeld over Bush admin mishandling of Iraq war, an arguing for more troops and the right strategy; The lame attempt to tag him as Bush's 3rd term will not work.

McCain will get our troops back home ... with HONOR.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Foreigners Have No Confidence in Obama's Policies

The Two obamas:

The same poll that documented unfavorable opinion of the United States also asked how much confidence respondents had in Obama’s projected international policies. The results will bring no joy to the Obama camp.

The countries having “a lot” of confidence in Obama’s foreign policy—25% and 23% respectively, are the ones that disapprove of us most strongly: Turkey and Pakistan. In five countries, confidence in Obama’s policies is in single digits: China 2%, Egypt 4%, Russia 5%, Lebanon 5%, Brazil 5%. The highest confidence is in Germany (24%) with Nigeria and France tied at 16%, and the United Kingdom at 13%.

Obama the man is idolized, the policies of Obama the possible president are viewed with profound skepticism. These contradictory commentaries and figures show that the world, like much of America, is swept up in a dream or fantasy about Obama. Unlike America, however, the world seems to understand that it is a dream. That is shown by the abysmal ratings they give to what they think Obama might actually do as president.

Hope over Experience

A vote for Obama is like a second marriage: the triumph of HOPE over EXPERIENCE.

What Obama really offers is HYPE and CHAINS.
The HYPE of an over-promising candidate, the CHAINS of a leftwing Socialist agenda.

Obama campaign slogans:

CHANGE ... what you'll have left after I raise taxes.
CHANGE ... your gas prices upwards, but gradually
CHANGE ... my hat size because every day my head gets bigger
CHANGE ... the national motto to: In Obama We Trust.
CHANGE ... what I do to my story depending upon whom I'm talking to.
CHANGE ... what I do every day to my foreign policy
CHANGE ... what I do to my trade policy depending upon whom I'm talking to
CHANGE ... your lifestyle because the rest of the world doesn't like you
CHANGE ... my friends when they turn out NOT to be "The person I knew"
CHANGE ... what my radical left-wing ideologue handlers have in store for you
CHANGE ... what I do to facts to suit my needs.
CHANGE ... FISA line that we crossed but I have now moved back
CHANGE ... from public to private campaign financing because I can raise more money
CHANGE ... I'll debateJohn McCain anytime, anywhere; except when and where he asks me.
CHANGE ... the words of others and claim they're mine, because words count.
CHANGE ... more of you into victims of something and build government programs to take care of you
CHANGE ... you into a ward of the state so that I OWN you and your vote
CHANGE ... your mind and believe in me for I am the Obamessiah come to save you
CHANGE ... into giggling sycophants; liberal mainstream media do under the spell of the Obamessiah
CHANGE ... the chant I use to control the weak-minded Obamanized masses
CHANGE ... into an Obamatron; join the cult, repeat the chant: CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE ...
CHANGE ... what I plan to do to America because it's the greatest country on the planet.
CHANGE ... the national anthems of all the nations of the world to Kumbaya using my messianic foreign policy skills
CHANGE ... into mumble-mouthed idiot when I don't have prepared speech to read.
CHANGE ... what I said because my rhetoric was overheated and amplified
CHANGE ... but not for us, not the left-wing liberal elite, CHANGE is for YOU.
CHANGE ... anything and everything I've said or done in my life if it will help me win
CHANGE ... the definition of change to: What I say, when I say it, to whom I say it.
CHANGE ... your underwear because you'll defecate in your pants when you wake up to find out what the left-wing liberal ideologues have done after gaining complete control of government.

CHANGE ... I can CHANGE
CHANGE ... you can't keep up with
CHANGE ... you better freaking BELIEVE in because it will WORK you over.
Obama: the AUDACITY to count on you and I being DOPEs

Obama = Status Quo Liberalism

Jay Ambrose Opines:
For all his rants about lobbyists, Obama represents no break from ties to special interests or independence from popular but ill-advised positions; he was for the lavish farm bill, he supports unions in their misbegotten opposition to free trade, he's an ethanol man through and through, and maybe he made at least some voters in Nevada happy with his opposition to the perfectly acceptable nuclear waste depository there. Unlike McCain, he has not been much of a compromiser in the U.S. Senate; if a bill is not sufficiently leftist, it gets no support from him.

Some movement toward the center would be welcome from this candidate, who maybe doesn't have to move an inch to win the general election.

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Michigan v Texas

The worst state in the union wrt the economy is Michigan - it is run by Democrats. Democrat Governor, Democrat lege, etc. Michigan has been shedding jobs, losing business left and right, and high unemployment, over 7%.

The best economic performing large state is Texas - lower unemployment, highest growth, more business and job creation - the Government there is run by Republicans - Republican Governor, republican lege, etc. More private sector job growth than any other state in the union and unemployment under 5%.

A vote for Obama is a vote to make America just like Michigan.

FAQ for the election

Q: How did you choose which candidate you support?

A: First question I ask: Which one will do more to support our freedom? Whichever candidate that is should get your vote.

The proper role of Government is to protect our freedom and rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The proper role of a citizen is to defend the society and that correct framework by supporting candidates who defend our Constitution and the framework of limited Government.

How to vote for freedom? Someone once said "A Government that can give you everything you want, can take everything you have." The biggest enemy of freedom, as proven by the history of the 20th century is Big Goverment. To defend freedom, vote for smaller Government. Vote for the candidates of smaller Government; the ones who are for lower taxes and lower tax rates; the ones who are for less speding, less pork barrelling; the ones for less regulation and more economic free markets; the ones who declare that Government should leave you alone; the ones who defend our constitutional rights to worship, speak out (ie no Fairness Docrine) and protect our propert rights (ie wont take it away with environmental regulation); the ones who *dont* promise more giveaways, more welfare, and more 'Govt will solve this or that problem' which sound good but never work and instead destroys our rights.

Also see how they will fight our enemies foreign and domestic (ie anti-crime and anti-terrorist) who want to deprive us of life and liberty. Being for freedom is not the same as being for anarchy, you want a Govt, but its role is limited. Things like fighting violent crime and defending our borders are within Govts real role.

No candidate is perfect. Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo came the closest of any of the Democrat or Republican candidates.

Socialists need not apply. Socialists destroy our freedom and our prosperity through Big Govt. Since Obama is a Big Govt socialist, he is completely unqualified and unsuitable to be in *ANY* elected office, let alone President. That leaves McCain as the best choice.

Now, there is another aspect, the character of the man. You need to ask - what are his values? What has he done in his life to reflect who he is inside? Is he honest, trustwrothy, competent, hardworking, or is he a charlatan?
Obama has no experience. He's never done anything to speak of. You know the saying about the company you keep? Well, all we can do with this man is look at the people closest to him to determine what kind of man he is. And so we have a Reverend Wright and Louis Farrakhan. What kind of man would be so closely associated with these two despicable characters? You want someone with experience and someone who didnt have so many radical hateful friends and associates like Obama does.

Proverbs 27:19
A mirror reflects a man's face , but what he is really like is shown by the kind of friends he chooses.

Obama has no substance. He and his wife are trying to convince us that we had no hope until he came into the picture and that ANY change is good. No need to bother about what it will be and how it (whatever it is) will come about. I'm sorry, but I'm pretty sure I don't look to the government and the president as my source of hope. Let's not forget the things his wife has said - the person closest to him. They are elitists who in their church 'reject middleclassness'; they view middle class Americans as simpletons who need the government controlling their lives. He wants BIG government. The government gets involved and only makes things worse but Obama's solution is to get government more involved in more areas.


Q: Why does the RNC feel like Obama is suppose to jump when they say jump?

A: It's politics. The RNC is challenging Obama to live up to his own words and claims and not be a snivelling lying hypocrite. Obama is free to respond or ignore. Voters are free to take note and keep score.

Obama criticizes the mortgage bankers, then hires a Democrat DC insider head of fannie Mae who got sweetheat deals from the company he criticized, Johnson. Turns out 2 Democrat Senators also got sweet deals. Corruption deluxe! After it got exposed, Obama threw him under the bus (along with Wright , Pfleger, Rezco, Farrakhan, etc.)

Obama criticizes lobbyists and insiders then hires them to do his vetting, Eric Holder, see below.

Will Obama live up to his own words or prove even before he's sworn in that his campaign is just same old political lies and pandering like we always get ... so far Obama is failing the test!

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008...
The criticism Thursday centered on Obama adviser Eric H. Holder Jr., who is scrutinizing candidates to be the Democratic presumptive presidential nominee's running mate. As deputy attorney general under President Clinton, Mr. Holder reviewed the last-minute pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich.

Charged with 51 counts of fraud, tax evasion and illegally trading with Iran, Mr. Rich fled to Switzerland in 1983 but won a pardon from Mr. Clinton in 2001. The decision prompted a congressional investigation because Mr. Rich's wife was a major Democratic donor and prosecutors said they were never consulted.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Obama's Campaign Finance Tricks

Obama has been fooling people with his phony claims that he does NOT take corporate and special interest money. Obama gets twice as much from "Big Oil" than McCain does. He met Soros in late 2006 and is in Soros billionaire pocket. He's put hedge fund operators on his economic team. He put DC insiders as his VP vetters. As the data shows, he's got more bundlers than anyone else. He even had 527s set up to get around contribution limits.



Obama's Campaign Funding, 2008
Total Raised: $264,492,301
Bundlers 358
Lobbyist Bundlers: 14

Obama is using the "527" campaign funding loophole. It is a legal funding loophole that is not counted in his official donations. Hillary and McCain reject the use of 527's but Obama welcomes the use of the loophole. McCain actually made a law that made the loophole illegal. Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court said 527's should be legal. McCain's law is no longer valid. The only way to really close the loophole is with a constitutional amendment.

A real funny thing is Obama criticized Edwards about funding while Obama was using the 527 loophole. It just proves Obama is a complete hypocrite.
Obama's supporters get around money limit (August 2007).

He doesn't tell the public he is using a campaign fund loophole. he doesn't tell people he's got bundlers including lobbyist bundlers. He doesn't tell people he promised to get into public financing if his opponent would and now have broken his word.

Obama's Laundry List of Lies

Obama LAUNDRY LIST OF LIES.
1.) Selma Got Me Born - LIAR, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965.

2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - LIAR, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.

3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - LIAR, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had

4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - LIAR, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespread violence in decades.

5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - LIAR, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn’t allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.

6.) My Name is African Swahili - LIAR, your name is Arabic and ‘Baraka’ (from which Barack came) means ‘blessed’ in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.

7.) I Never Practiced Islam - LIAR, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years,until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.

8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian - LIAR, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).

9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - LIAR, not one teacher says you could speak the language.

10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience - LIAR, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn’t even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.

11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - LIAR, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.

12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - LIAR, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.

13.)An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - LIAR, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn’t, and never did, exist.

14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life - LIAR, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn’t, and never did, exist.

15.) I Won’t Run On A National Ticket In ‘08 - LIAR, here you are, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.

16.) Present Votes Are Common In Illinois - LIAR, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.

17.) Oops, I Misvoted - LIAR, only when caught by church groups and democrats, did you beg to change your misvote.

18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - LIAR, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - LIAR, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.


20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - LIAR, you didn’t write it,introduce it, change it, or create it.

21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - LIAR, it took just 14 days from start to finish.

22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - LIAR, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear Donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.

23.) I Have Released My State Records - LIAR, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.

24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - LIAR, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.

25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - LIAR, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill.

26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - LIAR, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.

27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - LIAR, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.

28.) No One Contacted Canada About NAFTA - LIAR, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.

29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - LIAR, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel.

30.) I Am Not Acting As President Yet - LIAR, after the NAFTA Memo, a dead terrorist in the FARC, in Colombia, was found with a letter stating how you and he were working together on getting FARC recognized officially.

31.) I Didn’t Run Ads In Florida - LIAR, you allowed national ads to run 8-12 times per day for two weeks - and you still lost.

32.) I Won Michigan - LIAR, no you didn’t.

33.) I won Nevada - LIAR, no you did not.

34.) I Want All Votes To Count - LIAR, you said let the delegates decide.

35.) I Want Americans To Decide - LIAR, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.

36.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - LIAR, you passed 26, most of which you didn’t write yourself.

37.) My Campaign Was Extorted By A Friend - LIAR, that friend is threatening to sue if you do not stop saying this. Obama has stopped saying this.

38.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - LIAR, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.

39.) I Don’t Take PAC Money - LIAR, you take loads of it.

40.) I don’t Have Lobbysists - LIAR, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.

41.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - LIAR, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.

42.) My Campaign Never Took Over MySpace - LIAR, Tom, who started MySpace issued a warning about this advertising to MySpace clients.

43.) I Inspire People With My Words - LIAR, you inspire people with other people’s words.

44.) I Have Passed Bills In The U.S. Senate - LIAR, you have passed A BILL in the U.S. Senate - for Africa, which shows YOUR priorities.

45.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - LIAR, you weren’t in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time, unlike Kucinich, who seems to be out gutting you Obama. You also seem to be stepping back from your departure date - AGAIN.

46.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - LIAR, your plan leaves us all to pay the 15,000,000 who don’t have to buy it.

47.) I Only Found Out About My Investment Conflicts Via Mail - LIAR, both companies you site as having sent you letters about this conflict have no record of any such letter ever being created or sent.

48.) I Am As Patriotic As Anyone - LIAR, you won’t wear a flag pin and you don’t put your hand over your heart during the Anthem.

49.) My Wife Didn’t Mean What She Said About Pride In Country - LIAR, your wife’s words follow lock-step in the vain of Wright and Farrahkan, in relation to their contempt and hatred of America.

50.) Wal-Mart Is A Company I Wouldn’t Support - LIAR, your wife has received nearly a quater of a million dollars through Treehouse, which is connected to Wal-Mart.

51.) Treehouse Is A Small Company - LIAR, the CEO of Treehouse last year, made more than the CEO of Wal-Mart, according to public records.

52.) University Of Chicago Hospital Pay Is Fair - LIAR, your wife’s pay raise was nearly 150% her already bloated rate and the hospital is a Non-Profit Hospital, which made $100,000,000 in the last 3 years. They overcharge blacks VS whites for services, and overcharge everyone in general by 538%!

53.)I Barely Know Rezko - Only 5 Billed Hours - LIAR, you have known him for 17 years, and decided to do a real estate deal with him during a time when he was proven to be under investigation. Despite this, you divided your property and had them take off $300K before the mortgage problems started. Then Rezko’s wife buys the lot beside it that you can’t afford, saving you $625,000.

54.) My Donations Have Been Checked Thoroughly - LIAR, you only gave back Hsu ($72K) and Rezko ($150K) their money when publically called on their involvement in your campaigns.

55.) My Church Is Like Any Other Christian Church - LIAR, your church is so extreme, the pastor who married you, Rev. Wright, just got done blaming the US for 9/11 and named Louis Farrahkan their person of the year.

56.) I Disagree With My Church All The Time - LIAR, you still have yet to repudiate Wright, who married you and your wife, and you still donate large sums of money to assist the church in furthering its message - hatred and revenge. You donated in 2006 alone, $22,500 to the church that you so terribly disagree with. That is nearly $500 PER WEEK - that sure is disagreement, Senator Obama.

57.) I Have Clean Connections Despite Rezko - LIAR, you are not only connected to Exelon and Rezko, you are also connected to Hillary PAC supporter Mr. Hsu, AND an Iraqi Billionaire of ill repute, Nadhmi Auchi, who ripped off people in the Food For Oil, Iraqi deal. Seems Mr. Auchi may have helped Obama buy his million dollar property long before Obama had millions of dollars. Wonder what favors Mr. Auchi expects, when Obama leaves Iraq free to be taken over by special interests such as him.

58.) I never heard sermons like Rev. Wright’s, that have been in videos all day, You Tube - LIAR! 3 days later during your Mea Culpa BS speech you said “Did I hear controversial statements while sitting in the pew yes!"

59.) Iran is a tiny threat!..not Iran is killing us!!!!!!!

60.) Michelle Obama

Republicans Election Chances in 2008

They dont have a billionaire like Soros to underwrite and buy the whole election, an a lot more special interest money is going to the Democrats right now, but the Republicans are still on the right side of most of the issues.
- They are better on taxes, while Democrats want to increase taxes
- They are better on spending, fighting wasteful Democrat bills that have too much special interest pork
- They are better on national security, where Democrat keep wanting to weaken our ability to wage war against terrorists
- They are right to call for more domestic energy supply (drill in ANWR, offshore, nuclear, etc) while all the Democrats can do is slap on more taxes!
- They are better on health insurance, supporting a bill to cut insurance cost by allowing you to get insurance from any state, thereby opening choice that lowers costs

The Democrats may have more money but the Republicans are better for America.

Race and the 2008 Vote

Is it racist for a white person to vote for McCain because he is white?

The short answer would be "yes", if this is really a 'race is all I care about vote' or a vote to keep a black man out of office. But a longer answer is required, because the vector of the Obama campaign is clear: Guilt white people into voting for Barack because to do otherwise is 'racist', while taking advantage of the flipside benefit of those voting for a 'historic' choice, ie, white attracted to the least qualified nominee in American history simply because he is black and that means its 'cool' and 'good' to pick him. They are also using Obama's race as part of the 'change' theme - it sure is change to have a junior Senator, one of the youngest, least experienced, as well as the first black ever, to be in office. Change indeed!

A white voting for McCain should be no more a concern than the 95% of blacks in North Carolina who just happened to vote for the black man in the Dem primary over the white woman. They voted for the man who shared their ethnic heritage (although curiously Obama has no ancestors who *were* slaves and has ancestors who *were* slaveowners, which is different from most black Americans), and there is legitimate pride in such votes. It is not necessarily animus.

If you vote for Obama out of fear of being labelled racist or because you think 'its time' for a black man in the White House, you are also voting based on race. There is a lot of race-consciousness in this election, and Ferraro was correct - Obama would not have won the primary if he were white. Obama beat Hillary by being even more "change", putting his race as an historic element in his run, and having 95% of black primary voters supporting him. If he was another white Senator, it never would have happened. So his race has helped Obama immensely.

There is really not a single reason for any non-leftist to vote for the unqualified Obama. He's a junior Senator with the most liberal voting record in the Senate, zero accomplishments save getting elected, and very poor judgments, as shown by the friends he's had to disown this campaign. He's hoping to get a lot of votes via 'white guilt' even though he spent 20 years in an afrocentric church that blames "white man's greed" for ills of the world. Even though Barack called his grandma a "typical white person" for remarks that Obama thinks were racist. Even though he said that he thought Wright's comments (like 9/11 was "chickens coming home to roost" for America) were controversial.

Given all that, it's clear that even if you vote for McCain because he shares your ethnic heritage, you still wont be as racist as Barack Obama's closest friends, allies and supporters. Yet nobody questions the race-conscious supporters of Obama - Racism is apparently a one way street.

The Election is All About Obama

Obama is the biggest unknown in this election and so will be the main topic of the election.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Obama's Taxing Ways

Another Taxing Argument Against Obama, Tom Delay cites Maria Bartiromo:
‘He's going to take the capital gains tax at 15 percent right now all the way up to 25 to 28 percent,’ the ‘Money Honey’ tells Avenue. ‘Sell anything, like a home or stocks, and make a profit . . . [almost] 30 percent of the profit will go to the government instead of 15.’ The income tax is also in for a bump. Bartiromo says, ‘Right now [it] is 35 percent, Obama wants to take that to 39 percent .


Nation's Naomi Klein fears neoliberal (Robert Rubin types) in the White House while denouncing Milton Friedman's influence.

Refuting the Obama Pitch

"the first issue is the economy, the unemployment rate is now 5.5 percent. " - This is actually not a bad rate, it is below average of last 30 years and near full employment. Moreover, the economy was growing very fast under the Republicans from 2003 to 2006, it only slowed down since the Democrats took control of Congress.

"Price of gas and food had gone up" The Democrats promised to fix gas prices when they tookover Congress. I guess they lied. They oppose the solutions to lower gas prices: Drill in the US now, in ANWR, offshore and on federal lands. The Democrats are against shale, nuclear, clean coal, and want to increase gas prices through higher taxes. Their energy policies are awful.

"in one city alone there is more than 600 houses in foreclosure because the government doesn't support the people." That's an idiotic statement. The Govt spends over TWO TRILLION DOLLARS "supporting" people, on welfare, social security, housing subsidies, etc. those foreclosures happened because people bought houses they couldnt afford and took credit they shouldnt have to pay for it. Obama wants to spend $800 billion more on Govt programs. Who will pay? taxpayers and the next generation stuck with the debt from overspending... Its an endless money pit.

"Many lobbist in Washington are part of the problem. The lobbist in the the Republican party are in the interest of the elite, people who owns oil companies, pharmaceutical comp." Another idiotic statement. Do you really buy the lies of the Democrats that only Republicans get lobbyist money? Do you not know that Obama has gotten hundreds of millions from lawyers and elites in these industries, including oil, power co, hedge funds, pharma, and of course big-time Hollywood exec money. Trial lawyers are big Democrat givers, and their payback was a $1.6 billion tax giveaway in the Democrat energy bill.

" The lobbist do not want to pay a lot tax, so the middle class is suffering because they have to pay more tax than the rich." Another idiotic statement. #1, the 'rich' pay more. #2, the Bush tax cuts gave the middle class significant tax relief and cut the income tax for them significantly. The Democrats want to reverse that. In particular, Obama wants a higher capital gainst tax rate, which investors at all income levels will have to pay.

"3, college is expensive and the loans companies are making money on the students." - If you dont want
people to make money lending to you, pay cash. If you dont let companies make money, then there will be no lending.
Socialism is a bad idea, and govt loans are not as efficient as market loans. college is expensive for many reasons that the Democrats will make worse - #1 is that we over-subsidize the young.
"4. Healthcare and insurance is a problem, many people can't afford insurance, especially low income familes."
Democrats are to blame because they keep over-regulating healthcare and demanding more mandates. McCain's go the right idea, allow people to buy insurance from a company in any state. The competition will increase access and lower costs. The other thing the Democrats do wrong is fight against litigation reform, which has proven to cut healthcare costs.

"5, the war, it takes 10 billion per month to stay in Iraq."
BFD. The Govt spends 10 billion A DAY overall, so you are worried about 3% of the spending? What about the other 97%?!?

"The politics in Washing ton needs to be fixed and the middle class families needs to get a break from paying Higher taxes than the rich. Senator Obama says that these are the problems that the county face." Obama is lying. The real problems are:
- Govt policies restrict energy production, for example we cant drill in ANWR or offshore at all, cause higher gas prices
- Govt ethanol subsidies drive food prices higher
- Govt regulation drives healthcare costs higher
- The Democrats are unwilling to get on board a plan to WIN in Iraq, and that weakness projected to our enemies is dragging on the war

On every single issue, OBAMA WILL MAKE IT WORSE not better.
"I believe the democrats will bring changes because they are in the interest of the people, not in the insterest of the lobbist" - You have been lied to, sucker. Both parties have lobbyists and you are clueless if you think otherwise. Also, corporate America is not your enemy, dont trust the liars who say it is.

Barack Obama Wrong on Iraq

John McCain was right and Obama wrong on Iraq:
John McCain has won the Iraq argument. The disagreement on Iraq between McCain and Barack Obama, indeed between Democrats and Republicans, was not about the future of American "neocolonialism" or about the candidates' sympathy for the Marines and soldiers eager to return home. It was about the strategic benefit of keeping active U.S. troops in the War. John McCain believed that a continued American troop presence would hasten Iraq's progress toward national security and political reconciliation. Barack Obama thought a speedy withdrawal would best achieve that goal.


In short, Early in the campaign, Obama was against the surge, McCain was for it - McCain was right. It is time to reward the Republicans for being more right (or less wrong) on Iraq.
Bush made mistakes, but corrected them. The Democrats denounced the costs of the war, but had no credible plan to win and criticized the strategy that won the war. Who should win politically from that? Maybe the guy (John McCain) who was right all along.


Facts Matter on Iraq, and the fact is that we are winning decisively in Iraq in ways the media will not mention.

O’Hanlon explained that the last three months has been the “spring of the blossoming of Iraqi security forces” and Iraq is on an “impressive trajectory” although we have not yet “reached a stable end point.” He stressed that the 80% reduction in civilian violence was much better than he thought possible. He went through a detailed review of Basra, conceding that Maliki’s actions took the Americans by surprise and that in the first week things went poorly. However, by the second week two brigades were deployed from Al Anbar ( a testimony to massive improvements in Iraq security force logistics) and that the mission was successful, allowing the Iraqi army and national police force to now control the streets of Basra.

...

I asked O’Hanlon whether his previous criticism that Barack Obama was in denial about facts on the ground still stood. In a lengthy answer he and then Pollack avoided a partisan hit on Obama and I think revealed their true purpose: to inform the public and policy matters about the real situation in Iraq and allow Democrats to in essence climb back off the surge opposition policy limb they have crawled out on. (This is my description; they were quite tactful and even optimistic that this is a time when political leaders can reorient themselves to new facts.) Both indicated that it would be a mistake with critical provincial and national elections upcoming in 2008 and 2009 to begin an abrupt withdrawal in 2009. O’Hanlon offered that Democrats could take credit for having pressured Iraqis on a political front with the clear message that out presence would not be indefinite and that they should accept that “the good news is you may be able to leave earlier than proposed based on progress and not on defeat.” Continuing with the answer, Pollack said that “our support is absolutely critical” in the short term and that “a massive withdrawal of U.S. forces in 2009 is not a good idea.”

O’Hanlon continued by praising McCain’s May 2008 speech that envisioned half the forces out by the end of his first term.

One comment said: Gee, how gratifying to see the Truth, known by almost every Man and Woman who has served in Iraq, finally come to light. That the US military has been pursuing a successful strategy to train and set up effective indigenous security forces to make Iraq safe for Iraqis, allow reconstruction, allow reconciliation, and foster peace in the MidEast. A story the MSM has obfuscated, hidden, twisted, and just plain lied about for 5 yrs.

Ms. Rubin has pointedly made this article also advisory to the Dhimmicratic party, to allow them to “save face” just like the Iraqi culture needed a way to save face in policing their own country, taking charge of their own lives, instead of constantly blaming America for their own problems. Dhimmicrats in America are too far gone down the path of advocating Defeat for America to be forgotten or forgiven by the vast majority of Americans who remember what party played with the lives of American troops through its support and adoption of the enemy’s rhetoric, and their willingness to use our troops’ funding to win political advantage.

Most military folks never ask that the country, and especially the country’s leadership, be perfect to justify their defense of Her. But actively propounding our enemies’ positions as their own, and traitorously lending moral and rhetorical support to the insurgents and al Qaida, is the most dastardly and despicable use of the floors of Congress ever witnessed by the American public. And the military and the vast majority of the American people won’t soon forget who chose American Defeat over American Victory in the War on Terror.

Dhimmicrats: disgusting, cowardly, and WRONG on the war.

Obama Democrat Agenda

- AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS
- SOCIALIZED MEDICINE HIGHER COSTS LESS FREEDOM
- DEMS PUT BILLIONS FOR LIB SPECIAL INSTERESTS
- END CLEAN UNION ELECTIONS (end the secret ballot)
- DAVIS-BACON ADDS BILLIONS TO GOVT COSTS
- $800 BILLION TAX INCREASE
- LIBERAL ACTIVIST SCOTUS JUSTICES; MEANS ROE V WADE FOR 30 MORE YEARS
- RETREAT AND DEFEAT IN IRAQ
- GAYS IN THE MILITARY
- PUSH FOR GAY MARRIAGE FROM THE "BULLY PULPIT"
- CLIMATE BILL REGULATES OUR CO2 WITH TRILLIONS IN COSTS
- NO SOLUTION TO SOCIAL SECURITY EXCEPT HIGHER TAXES
- NO RELIEF ON ENERGY; NO DRILLING

And let's not forget Obama's anti-2nd Amendment positions

Obama runs away from McCain meeting

McCain camp not happy with Obama resistance to town halls

Barack Obama's counter-offer to do two joint forums on top of the three sanctioned debates is far short of what the McCain camp wants. Team McCain recognizes that their preferred 10 won't come to fruition but think Obama's counter is something of an insult.

And they have a counter to the counter:

“Barack Obama requires more preconditions to meet with voters and John McCain than he does Mahmoud Ahmadinejad," said McCain spokesman Tucker Bound

Obama holds on to Eric Holder, Corrupt Insider

Holder is in the crosshairs:

Obama adviser Eric H. Holder Jr., who is scrutinizing candidates to be the Democratic presumptive presidential nominee's running mate. As deputy attorney general under President Clinton, Mr. Holder reviewed the last-minute pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich.

Charged with 51 counts of fraud, tax evasion and illegally trading with Iran, Mr. Rich fled to Switzerland in 1983 but won a pardon from Mr. Clinton in 2001. The decision prompted a congressional investigation because Mr. Rich's wife was a major Democratic donor and prosecutors said they were never consulted.

Indicted by then-U.S. Attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mr. Rich failed to return to the U.S. following the indictment and was on the FBI's Most Wanted list for several years. Mr. Holder had given a "neutral, leaning towards favorable" opinion of the pardon that led directly to the pardoning of Mr. Rich on Mr. Clinton's last day in office.

"I think it is a matter of record that Mr. Holder recommended the pardoning of Mr. Rich," Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, told reporters Thursday.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Michelle Obama

Obama campaign is in defensive mode, trying to castigate all the stories about Obama's past, associates etc. as 'smears'. One of them is the rumor of Michelle saying "whitey" in a speech/rant in 2004 at a conference set up by Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH crowd. Nothing has substantiated that rumor.

But we don't need that rumor to be offended and repelled:
A picture shows that indeed Michelle Obama shared a panel in 2004 with Mrs Farrakhan.
The Obama file


In a February 2007 appearance with her husband on 60 Minutes, Mrs. Obama implied that America's allegedly rampant white racism posed a great physical threat to her husband, who had just announced his candidacy for the 2008 presidential race.
Michelle, addressing a congregation at South Carolina's Pee Dee Union Baptist Church, begins with a broad assessment of life in America in 2008, and life is not good: we’re a divided country, we’re a country that is "just downright mean," we are "guided by fear," we’re a nation of cynics, sloths, and complacents. "We have become a nation of struggling folks who are barely making it every day," she said, as heads bobbed in the pews. "Folks are just jammed up, and it’s gotten worse over my lifetime. And, doggone it, I’m young. Forty-four!"

"That before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls -- our souls are broken in this nation."

Michelle Obama proclaimed on February 18th, that for "the first time in her adult life," she was proud of America, as she spoke during a rally to support her husband’s presidential bid.

During a rally in downtown Milwaukee, Michelle said, "Hope is making a comeback and, let me tell you, for the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change,"

Michelle Obama's thesis
Wrights pupil - Michelle Obama
Her thesis is replete with the racial separatist attitude of Rev Wright:
"My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my 'blackness' than ever before," the future Mrs. Obama wrote in her thesis introduction. "I have found that at Princeton, no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don’t belong. Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second."

But get this:
"In a [February 2008] interview with Newsweek, [Michelle] Obama reveals that she got into Princeton … not on the strength of her grades, which she admits were unexceptional, but thanks to her brother Craig, a star athlete and gifted student who preceded her to the school. As a 'legacy' candidate and a beneficiary of affirmative action, Michelle Obama was granted an opportunity that others more accomplished were denied."

February 29th, Michelle visited Zanesville, Ohio, where she met with a group of women at a local day care center. She said, "We left corporate America, which is a lot of what we’re asking young people to do," she tells the women. "Don’t go into corporate America. You know, become teachers. Work for the community. Be social workers. Be a nurse. Those are the careers that we need, and we’re encouraging our young people to do that. But if you make that choice, as we did, to move out of the money-making industry into the helping industry, then your salaries respond."

In the same speech, Mrs. Obama demonstrated how out-of-touch she is, by bemoaning the amount of money she has to spend, $10,000, on "piano and dance and sports supplements" and "summer programs and so on and so forth," for her two children. What she didnt tell people: the Chicago Tribune reported that Mrs. Obama’s compensation at the University of Chicago Hospital, where she is a vice president for community affairs, jumped from $121,910 in 2004, just before her husband was elected to the Senate, to $316,962 in 2005, just after he took office. Nice cushy salary for an 'community affairs' job. And she has the gall to speak about us being 'broken'?!? About how hard it is in America?!? to lecture others to be less materialistic?!?

Obama's wife has not been slandered. Obama's wife has been slandering America.

Sources, Links:
Michelle Obama file
http://www.dontvoteobama.net

OBAMA Is Another Jimmy Carter

Carter and Obama
via
Naked Emperor News

OBAMA= CARTER ALL OVER AGAIN.

Carter had a vague and vacuous 'hope' and "change' campaign and being a 'different kind of politician'. Sound familiar. In office, he was naive, weak and incompetent in all matters - economy, energy, foriegn affairs. Our enemies gained around the world, and USA was mocked by an Iranian hostage ordeal. Carter the fool blamed the 'malaise' on the people and not his own administration.

" A truly good man that was in office at the wrong time."
NEVER is the right time for this kind of idiot.
Carter was in personal ways rather small-minded. He blamed Reagan for beating him in 1980, rather foolishly forgetting that it was the people that fired him.

Obama will be worse than Carter.

Obama's Muslims Roots Examined

Obama is not a Muslim.

MelaniePhillips does the unthinkable, and digs into Obama's muslims roots: " the concerns about Obama’s Muslim antecedents arise from the fact that a) he has tried to conceal them and b) that he has a puzzling number of indirect connections with radical Islamists or their supporters."

1) He has gone out of his way to support in Kenya Raila Odinga, head of the Luo tribe, who promised to introduce sharia law if elected. Obama interrupted his New Hampshire campaign to speak by phone with Odinga. As the Investor’s Business Daily has reported, his half-brother Abongo ‘Roy’ Obama is a Luo activist in Kenya and a militant Muslim who argues that the black man must ‘liberate himself from the poisoning influences of European culture’ and urges Barack to embrace his African Muslim heritage.
2) His mentor, the black power-supporting Christian pastor Jeremiah Wright, is a close associate of Louis Farrakhan, the demagogue leader of the black power, Jew-hating militant organisation Nation of Islam. A number of Obama’s own staffers have been members of the Nation of Islam.

3) Tony Rezko, who was recently convicted of fraud, money laundering and bribery conspiracy, has been a major supporter of Obama and contributor to his cause – the full extent of which Obama tried to conceal. ... But what has received far less attention is Rezko’s connections with the Nation of Islam. Reszko, born in Syria, was a business associate of Jabir Herbert Muhammad, the son of the founder of the Nation of Islam, Elijah Muhammad, serving as a vice president and general manager of JHM’s firm Crucial Inc. And finally, Rezko was bailed from jail by Ali Baghdadi, the ‘Middle East adviser’ to the Nation of Islam.

Obama - the rookie

Based on the responses so far, it's clear they dont care.
Obama has NO executive experience. Never had to manage anything bigger than a Senate staff. He has NO legislative accomplishments worthy of note (co-sponsoring someone elses bill is pathetic response!) Obama skipped out on 130 votes as state senator. He was barely in office one year as US Senator, with zero accomplishments save for one good speech, and he started running for President. Even OBAMA admitted he lacked the experience to be President.

He is weak, feeble, and is a very leftwing Senator who has thrown multiple extremist radical friends under the bus in this campaign to save his political skin.

He is the worst nominee from either party in our lifetimes and will be a disaster as President. The worst President in the last 40 years was Jimmy Carter. Obama will be worse.

------
Do you get to walk in with just a College degree and become CEO of a large company? No! You need to have PROVEN your ability. I've had to make hiring decisions and you NEVER hire someone based on promises alone. You'll end up hiring incompetent liars.

These are fair questions. What has he led? What has he accomplished? Those things will tell you if he's for real or just a shuck-n-jive faker who will end up as pathetic as "an outsider for Change" Jimmy Carter did.

McCain led the largest Air Force fighter squadron back in 1970s when Barack was in high school smoking pot. McCain was leading on national security issues in the U.S. Senate when Obama was a mere state senator skipping out on votes.

Obama claims he can reach out, but has the voting record of a partisan leftwinger. McCain has actually done bipartisan legislating for years.

Obama has only proven he can give good teleprompter-speeches. Other than that, he is no more qualified for running the largest organization, the US Federal govt, than I am. Scary!

Obama had to throw his VP 'vetter' overboard this week. He made a ROOKIE MISTAKE and showed he's just the same kind of DC insider politician as the rest of them. Smart people need to wake up and smell the coffee. He's not ready to be President.

OBAMA'S TOP 5 FOREIGN POLICY CREDENTIALS

Foreign Policy Credential #1: "Life Of Living Overseas" For 4 Years ...
In Elementary School: Obama Lived Overseas From Ages 6 To 10.(Linda Matchan, "A Law Review Breakthrough," The Boston Globe, 2/15/90)

Foreign Policy Credential #2: Took Some College Courses In
International Relations: In January, Obama Noted His Degree In "International Relations" When Discussing His Foreign Policy Credentials. Obama: "[M]y experience in foreign policy is probably more diverse than most others in the field. ... You know, I majored in international relations." (ABC's "Good Morning America," 1/24/07)

Another Obama Exaggeration?: On His Official MySpace Webpage, Obama Lists His Major As "Political Science." (MySpace Website, http://www.myspace.com,
Accessed 4/10/08)

Foreign Policy Credential #3: Has Passed Only One Bill As A Senator ...
It Dealt With A Foreign Country: In The 110th Congress, Obama Is The Lead Sponsor On 55 Bills. (S. 114, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 115, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 116, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 117, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 133, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 433, Introduced 1/30/07; S. 453, Introduced 1/31/07; S. 674, Introduced 2/16/07; S. 692, Introduced 2/27/07; S. 713, Introduced 2/28/07; S. 737, Introduced 3/1/07; S. 767, Introduced 3/6/07; S. 768, Introduced 3/6/07; S. 795, Introduced 3/7/07; S. 823, Introduced 3/8/07; S. 906, Introduced 3/15/07; S. 976, Introduced 3/23/07; S. 1067, Introduced 3/29/07; S. 1068, Introduced
3/29/07; S. 1084, Introduced 4/10/07; S. 1151, Introduced 4/18/07; S. 1181, Introduced 4/20/07; S. 1222, Introduced 4/25/07; S. 1271, Introduced 5/2/07; S. 1306, Introduced 5/3/07; S. 1324, Introduced 5/7/07; S. 1389, Introduced 5/14/07; S. 1430, Introduced 5/ 17/07; S. 1513, Introduced 5/24/07; S. 1574, Introduced 6/7/07; S. 1713, Introduced 6/27/07; S. 1790, Introduced 7/16/07; S. 1811, Introduced 7/18/07; S. 1817, Introduced
7/19/07; S. 1818, Introduced 7/19/07; S. 1824, Introduced 7/19/07; S. 1873, Introduced 7/25/07; S. 1885, Introduced 7/26/07; S. 1977, Introduced 8/2/07; S. 1989, Introduced 8/3/07; S. 2030, Introduce 9/6/07; S. 2044, Introduced 9/12/07; S. 2066, Introduced 9/18/07; S. 2111, Introduced 9/27/07; S. 2132, Introduced 10/3/07; S. 2147, Introduced 10/4/07; S. 2202, Introduced 10/18/07; S. 2224, Introduced 10/24/07; S. 2227, Introduced
10/24/07; S. 2330, Introduced 11/8/07; S. 2347, Introduced 11/13/07; S. 2392, Introduced 11/16/07; S. 2428, Introduce 12/6/07; S. 2433, Introduced 12/7/07)

None Of The Bills Sen. Obama Has Introduced In The 110th Congress Have Been Signed Into Law.


In The 109th Congress, Obama Was Lead Sponsor On 61 Bills. But Only One Of These (1.6%) Has Passed The Senate (The Bill Went On To Become Law). S. 2125, a bill to "promote relief, security, and democracy in the Democratic Republic of Congo" became law in December 2006. (S. 2125, Became Law 12/22/06)

Foreign Policy Credential Number #4: Visited Pakistan For Three Weeks While In College:

"To Counter Opponents' Accusations That He Lacks Experience In Foreign Policy, Senator Barack Obama ... Has Added A New Personal Detail To That Resume: A Trip To Pakistan While A College Student." "To counter opponents' accusations that he lacks experience in foreign policy, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois often cites his ties to relatives in poor villages in Kenya and the years he spent growing up in Indonesia. Now he has added a
new personal detail to that resume: a trip to Pakistan while a college student." (Larry Rohter, "Obama Says Real-Life Experience Trumps Rivals' Foreign Policy Credits," The New York Times, 4/10/08)

Obama Spent "About Three Weeks" In Pakistan. "According to his campaign staff, Mr. Obama visited Pakistan in 1981, on the way back from Indonesia, where his mother and half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, were living. He spent 'about three weeks' there, Mr. Obama's press secretary, Bill Burton, said, staying in Karachi with the family of a college friend, Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, but also traveling to Hyderabad, in India." (Larry Rohter, "Obama Says Real-Life Experience Trump s Rivals' Foreign Policy Credits," The New
York Times, 4/10/08)

Foreign Policy Credential #5: Member Of Foreign Relations Committee ...
Reluctantly.

"Listening To A Bloviating Colleague At His First Meeting Of The Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Obama Slipped A Three-Word Note To A Member Of His Staff: 'Shoot. Me. Now.'" (Ben Wallace-Wells, "Destiny's Child," Rolling Stone, 2/7/07)

The Wright Stuff

A links roundup on Wrights sermons and Barack Obama's black nationalist beliefs and associations.
Barack Obama Candidate
Trumpet magazine - Wrights mag features Obama and farrakhan on same cover page

Kausfiles on Wright - "White Man's Greed"
FR
Obama quits Trinity
Nation of Islam on Obama camp payroll
Townhall column
Israpundit - Obama’s Black Nationalist Politics, In His Own Words
Frontpage article
Hannity interview on Black Liberation Theology

Wright YouTubes:
Barack is an anti-White Racist - "Dreams from my Father" excerpts
More video
Wright stuff

Is Obama Wright? - Pastor Jeremiah Wright & Senator Barack - "I don't think my church is that controversial." Wrong, Senator Obama!
Wright anti-Israel sermon statement
Best of Wright's Sermons
"Hillary ain't never been called a N*****R" - says Wright
Barack Obama's church gave Farrakhan an award
Farrakhan calls Obama the Messiah

Rev Wright is an extremist radical leftist. Rev Wright is a lot like Rev Farrakhan, and he preaches an Afrocentric 'black liberation theology' view that is marxist and black separatist. The "anti-American" charge comes from him saying bat-s**t crazy stuff like "God D8mn America!" Wright and Farrakhan. hates the power of whites and the power of Jews, and preach an alienation from what America represents. He preaches to support the "homeland" - is it USA? No, its *Africa*. I don't think you can get more anti-American than that.

.... "age 293 (paperback edition) Obama remembers a sermon by Rev. Jeremiah Wright: "... It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-a-Prince see in a year, where white folks' greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere ... That's the world! On which hope sits." And so it went, a meditation on a fallen world. While the boys next to me doodled on their church bulletin, Reverend Wright spoke of Sharpesville and Hiroshima, .... "

Well, it was a very SIMILAR speech that Wright gave after 9/11, which ALSO mentioned Shapresville and Hiroshima and which ALSO lambasted evil Amerikkka's death-dealing, and then said "The chickens have come home to roost!" Wright's view of America is very dark.

"Does disagreeing with choices made by your government make you unpatriotic??" Do leading beside-the-point questions win the argument? Wright falsely claimed that AIDS was a government plot to keep the black man down. That's nuts!

The real issue is that Wright is a crazy extremist who doesnt merely disagree with one or two things, but is against the "System" that is America. He says its an "Arrogant, white-run racist superpower" and blames USA for 9/11, we 'deserved' it. Black Liberation Theology is the politics of the black panther party in the pulpit and Wright preaches it. His "christianity" is not recognizable to real Christians - yet Barack Obama was very attracted to it, precisely because Obama wanted a black 'identity' and found it in these extremist views.

It is clear from his autobiography that Barack Obama is attracted to and shares Wrights radicalism and Wrights message that "White man's greed" ruins the world, and that is why Obama praised Wright in the past, used Wright's line as the title to his book, got federal grant money for his church, and got his endorsement. Obama defended Wright and initially said he thought Wrights views were not controverisal.


Barack Obama joined the Afrocentric black liberation theology Trinity church less out of a calling to Jesus and more a calling to leftwing activism. When Obama first undertook his agitating work in Chicago's South Side poor neighborhoods, he was un-churched. Yet his office was in a Church and most of the folks he needed to agitate and organize were Church people -- pastors and congregants -- who took their churches and their church-going very seriously. Again and again, he was asked by pastors and church ladies, "Where do you go to Church, young man?" There were personal and political motivations for Obama to belong to a congregation, as well. So, Obama finally joined a church, in part to deepen what one friend called "a whole web of relationships" in the community that gave him a strong political base and a well-connected mentor. (See The Obama File.)

This church, Trinity, just happens to be run by a man, Rev Wright, who is not just controversial in his way, but who is close friends with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. In fact, the style of Wright and Farrakhan is similar. Obama has several Nation of Islam adherents on his staff, and Obama attended and helped organize Farrakhan's million-man march.

Ultimately, the real issue is that Obama's dishonest campaign is now running from the real 20-years-at-Trinity Obama and concocting a fake one who claims not to know about Wrights radical views. This phony campaign charade can be believed only by the very naive. Obama is either an extremist like Wright or a political opportunist of the worst sort - or both.

OBAMA TOO LIBERAL says Democrats

FIRST DEMOCRAT DEFECTS; OBAMA TOO LIBERAL
Democratic Rep. Dan Boren of Oklahoma said Tuesday that Sen. Barack Obama is "the most liberal senator" in Congress and he has no intention of endorsing him for the White House. He said that while Obama has talked about working with Republicans, "unfortunately, his record does not reflect working in a bipartisan fashion."

TENNESSE DEMOCRAT SAYS HE HAS "BAD CONNECTIONS"
Tennessee Democratic Party Executive Committee member Fred Hobbs tells The City newspaper in Nashville, "I don't exactly approve of a lot of the things he stands for — and I'm not sure we know enough about him. He's got some bad connections, and he may be terrorist connected for all I can tell. It sounds kind of like he may be."

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Code Pink Supports Obama

Another Obama association scandal brewing - Code Pink wackos are bundlers for Obama.

Code Pink is a vile Leftwing agitation group.

Code Pink's support for Fallujah jihadists and other Iraqi insurgents was support given to the group that murdered western aid workers, beheaded civilians and terrorized whole cities.

These terrorists also killed election workers and other Iraqi civilians ... The terrorists wanted to kill Iraqi democracy. Reuters photographer in Dec 2004 recorded a grisly execution: "A gunman, left, shoots and kills a man lying in Baghdad's Haifa Street after being pulled from a car Sunday, Dec. 19, 2004. The man at right on his knees was executed moments later, along with another man not shown in picture. About 30 militants hurling hand grenades and firing machine guns attacked a car carrying five people employed by the commission's Baghdad office and tried 'to drag them out,' said Adel al-Lami, a member of the Independent Electoral Commission of Iraq." Three were killed, and two escaped.

The insurgents did this in late 2004 to terrorize Iraqis out of the elections. Despite murders and attack by insurgents, the insurgents failed to stop the elections in January 2005 and later. Code Pink supported these terrorists when they went to voice support for the insurgency. As reported in 2005:

The group's co-founder, Jody (sic) Evans, was an international observer at the World Tribunal on Iraq in June 2005. The Tribunal culminated in a statement signed by ativists (sic) from 10 countries that characterized the insurgency as "legitimate and justified" and called for war crimes charges against Bush and other world leaders who backed the U.S. invasion. (Washington City Paper, issue of January 11-17, 2008)

Ms. Evans, who markets herself to the media as a peace activist, issued the following statement regarding her support for the terrorist-led insurgency in Iraq while at the tribunal: "We must begin by really standing with the Iraqi people and defending their right to resist. I can remain myself against all forms of violence, and yet I cannot judge what someone has to do when pushed to the wall to protect all they love. The Iraqi people are fighting for their country, to protect their families and to preserve all they love. They are fighting for their lives, and we are fighting for lies." (AlterNet, June 26, 2005)

Just charming. They defended the terrorists. Ayers, Wright, the PLO Khalidi, now this vile leftist terrorist-justifying radical?

Obama against good elections

Safe union elections in jeopardy if Obama wins:

How would you like elections without secret ballots? To most people, the notion of getting rid of secret ballots is absurd. This is modern-day America. Such an idea could not be seriously considered, right?

People support secret balloting for very obvious reasons. Politics frequently generates hot tempers. People can put up yard signs or wear political buttons if they want. But not everyone feels comfortable making his or her political positions public. Many would rather vote without fearing that their choice will offend or anger someone else.

Secret balloting has solved another potential problem: vote buying, which they essentially ended in U.S. elections. After all, why pay people if you couldn't be sure how they voted?

But if Barack Obama becomes president, secret ballots seem destined to end for at least one type of election: union certifications.

Currently, when 50 percent of workers in a company sign statements to unionize, that merely sets up a second stage, where workers vote by secret ballot to determine if the company would be unionized. Under the new proposal, using a system called “Card Check,” unionization would occur as soon as half the workers had signed cards stating that they favor union representation.

In other words, up until now, a worker could placate union supporters and sign a statement saying that he wanted a union and then vote against the union when he was protected by the secrecy of the voting booth. (Continued)

Obama's Johnson Thrown Under the Bus - Ouch!

Suddenly Obama is feeling the pain of his demagogic bashing of captains of industry. Boomerang, and the ex-Fannie Mae chief, a DC insider, is tossed under the bus to protect Barack's political viability. Ouch, it's gotta hurt throwing your favorite Johnson under the bus, to join Obama's grandmother, Rev Wright, Pfleger, and a host of other sundry nefarious characters. D’OH-bama’s Mortgage Mess" claims a victim:

And if you’re going to attack political opponents for playing “textbook Washington games,” it would probably be best not to play them yourself. If you do, you’ll end up tongue-tied in front of the cameras, hung by your own holier-than-thou rhetoric and faced once again with the decision to throw another bad choice under the bus.

"These are the people who are responsible for infecting the economy and helping to create a home foreclosure crisis." ... "These executives crossed the line to boost their bottom line." That's what Obama called the Mortgage CEOs. Then he hired one who ran Fannie Mae and got a sweetheart deal from one of the most notorious of them, Countrywide, to vet his VP picks:
Johnson, who has advised past failed Democratic nominees Walter Mondale and John Kerry, was CEO of the beleaguered, government-backed mortgage giant, Fannie Mae. Over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported that Johnson accepted more than $7 million in below-market-rate loans from scandal-plagued subprime lender Countrywide Financial Corp. The company’s CEO, Angelo Mozilo, had set up a very special loan program for his high-powered pals. Johnson had named Mozilo to Fannie Mae’s national advisory committee more than a decade ago and they maintained a cozy friendship.


Jim Johnson is a corrupt insider. Barack Obama is an insider charlatan puppet for the leftwing special interests out there pretending to be Mr Outsider. He's not; he's bought and paid for by Soros. Meanwhile, the MSM pays no attention to the Soros-Johnson connection (Perseus, look it up.) Obama weakly has to undo bad decisions to save his own skin.

Malkin has the details, and wraps it up thus: "There are only so many gaffes, missteps, mistakes, flubs, and self-delusional statements one can make before serial naivete becomes endemic stupidity. Obama has reached the point of no return." Clue for America: This man is NOT READY to be President.

Obama Pics


Added some pics and graphics to the blog.

White Supremacists for Obama

You know that line about "a black man voting for the KKK", (as in, "a conservative voting for Leftist Barack Obama makes as much sense as ...."). Well, What about the KKK voting for a black man?

Obama's core voters are: The young; the dependents of Government who want more; the stupid; and the progressives/leftists. Mark them in the 'stupid' category.

Obama Quotes

"I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction", page 261 of The Audacity of Hope.

"I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13 when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."

‘My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you’ll join with me as we try to change it.’

- Barack Obama

The Company Barack Keeps

"Tell me what company you keep and I’ll tell you what you are", a quote from Cervantes headlines this essay on Obama's extremist associations.

We are not to know that Barak Hussein Obama’s official website
attracts hateful psychotics: Socialists for Obama, Muslims for Obama, Black
Panthers for Obama, or Jemaah Islamiyah’s statement on the website “ We
are a group that supports social justice for our oppressed Muslim brothers all
over the world.

We support Barack Obama for President because he is sympathetic to the
plight of Muslims. He is a man of integrity, who will not be bullied by the neo-
cons and the Zionists. He will stand up for our oppressed Palestinian brothers
and sisters, whose land is being illegally occupied by the evil Zionist entity
whose name I just hate to even write.”

Obama website managers are now blocking Google’s cache from saving their
pages, and have removed their pages from the Internet Archive and Coral
archives to insure that when they throw a post down the memory hole it stays
gone forever. Liberal Democrat gadfly’s do not want you to know his circle of
friends include childhood mentor and American communist Frank Davis, that
his supporters include Raila Ordinga, Islamic candidate in Kenya and Obama’s
cousin, David Ortega, Marxist Sandinista leader, Nicaragua, Raul Castro,
communist leader, Cuba.

Hyde Park Obama

Mr Obama's Neighborhood, the Weekly Standard drills down to look into his Chicago roots.

Obama's Spendthrift Ways

Excessive lavish spending and its just his campaign: "Makes you wonder what kind of tax-and-spend operation Obama will run once he doesn't have to depend on voluntary contributors to foot the bill. Also makes you wonder how biased the media must be that it would characterize the Obama campaign as lean and efficient when in reality it is desperate, spendthrift, and broke."


Indeed!


A poll by WSJ shows Obama ahead but it also shows 19% of Clinton primary voters going for McCain!

Ayers

Bill Ayers sat with Barack Obama, his good friend, on a leftist foundation, that doled out money to fellow leftists and left-wing causes. Ayers gave Obama his start, by fundraising for him.
Who is Bill Ayers? An American-freedom-hating Sixties radical who was a violent terrorist leader of the Weather Underground. A man who plotted to bomb the pentagon 30 years before bin laden thought to do it.




Now he gets 'respectable' profiles where he can vent his radicalism.


"I don’t regret setting bombs," Ayers was quoted in the opening line of the Times profile; "I feel we didn’t do enough."


Horowitz interviewed him once and he said: "Guilty as hell. Free as a bird. America is a great country."


Bill Ayers TODAY (April 6, 2008), from his own red communist star-headed website, begging to debate communism vs capitalism with Sean Hannity and STILL calling for revolution:

"Imperialism. I’m against it, and if Sean Hannity and others were honest, this is the ground they would fight me on. Capitalism played its role historically and is exhausted as a force for progress: built on exploitation, theft, conquest, war, and racism, capitalism and imperialism must be defeated and a world revolution—a revolution against war and racism and materialism, a revolution based on human solidarity and love, cooperation and the common good —must win.


More here.

Obama - Reality vs Campaign

Response to TNR article on Obama. Bruce Bartlett on the Obamacons. The'yve been Obama-conned.


The real truths are:
- Obama's life history is steeped in the Left. His socialist Dad, progressive-left Mom, Communist mentor, radical supporters and friends (Ayers, New Party, Democratic Socialists), and his Farrakhan-like radical Afrocentrist church (Wright, Trinity), etc.
- His voting record is highly partisan and leftwing, the most liberal Senator as rated by National Journal. he is extremist on abortion, even opposing a 'Born Alive Infant Protection Act' in Ill. Senate, and being 100% NARAL, etc.
- Obama is clueless about the economy in ways that any free-market lover would shudder. (consider his view that raising capital gains tax rates is still okay eve n if it doesnt raise money. Does Bruce Bartlett agree to that or support that? I would think "The seven Fat years" author, who praised the Reagan tax cuts and supports the Bush tax cuts, would lament Obama's views
- Obama, Like Clinton in 1992, is throwing enough moderate/conservative 'vibes' thrown out, that have nothing to do with his agenda. Even when they are not true, and he slips - for example, Obama lied when he claimed he was never in church when Wright fulminated against white 'oppression'. The lie is disproven by Obama's own words in his autobiographies, where he details exactly what Wright was about and what he said and how it inspired him.
- Obama's elitist slip-of-tongue in San Fran (the remark about "clinging to God") exposed his Christian commitments as more shallow than his commitment to leftist intellectual sociological analysis. He's got more Marx than Jesus in his value system.
- His history of helping radicals, like his earmarks for Trinity and for “America is the greatest sin against God;” Pfleger (The New York Times reported in early May that the Catholic Church run by Rev. Pfleger received a $100,000 earmark from Sen. Obama)
- Obama has helped radicals in the Palestinian cause too. PLO front man Rashid Khalidi, a Yasser Arafat toady, got $75,000 through Obama and Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers from the Woods Foundation, and later Khalidi returned the favor by hosting a fundraiser for Obama.

Obama's campaign is more phony than most campaigns, which are all some level of hype. Alexrod's lifted/plagiarized rerun of Deval Patrick's 2006 campaign is a template, write whatever 'change' you wish. The vacuum might make some naive fools write in their own wish-fulfillment; but this is just Perot redux and Carter/76 retread. Been there, done that; maybe thats why Obama wins the under 30 crowd and McCain the over 30 crowd. If you've been there before you know its a phony charade.

There is absolutely nothing in Obama's history to suggest he even is familiar with conservative ideas let alone would reach across and agree with any of them. having an inspiring life story may validate conservatives truths but that doesnt make Obama one. (and actually, I dont see how going from elite private school to ivy league to political success is such a stretch, whatever the color).

Obama's record and history is even to the left of most Democrats. Maybe that's why Rep Boren is wary of Obama.
Conservatives might lament a moderate like McCain as the GOP pick, but anyone who believes in small Government, American national sovereignty, or traditional values will find absolutely NOTHING in Obama. Nothing worth supporting at all. He's a progressive left candidate through and through and any attempt to sell him as something else is just blatant dishonesty.

Either these are phony conservatives or they are uninformed conservatives bamboozled by the admittedly brilliant yet dishonest campaign of Alexrod and Co.
Soros is very pleased, I am sure.

Obama on Immigration

Obama manages the difficult feat of being distinctly worse than McCain; distinctly more 'open borders and give illegal aliens everything they DREAM for' including welfare for legal immigrants, drivers licenses for illegal aliens, against a real border fence, *and* citizenship within 10 years for illegal aliens. he wants more legal ‘chain migration’ to keep the pipeline of future Democrat voters and Govt welfare recipients stuffed. Obama the junior senator voted with Senator Durbin, one of the most fervent senators for DREAM Act, amnesty, etc. Alas, McCain too falls in the trap of "we need comprehensive reform". So when it comes to immigration, bad bills will be stopped in Congress or not stopped at all.



Obama voted horribly on every single amendment that came up during the immigration debate:
- Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security.
- Obama was for an amendment that added to chain migration and cut the guts of one good part of the bill, moving away from chain migration.
- border security? Voted to filibuster the border fence
- Obama was even for rewarding illegal gang members and criminals with amnesty ... no conditions.
- Obama co-sponsored for comprehensive immigration reform
* Voted on Senate floor in favor of amendment to expand chain migration in 2007 (SA 1183 to S.1348)
* Voted on Senate floor against an amendment to bar certain criminals from U.S. in 2007( SA 1184 to S.1385). Certain criminals included absconders, alien security risks, sex offenders, gang members, and other domestic violence offenders
* Voted in favor of the DREAM ACT in 2007 which reward illegal aliens with amnesty
* Co-sponsored the AgJobs Bill 2007 (S.340). Bill would create an amnesty for illegal agricultural workers.
http://www.firesociety.com/article/21856




Positions from debates:

* The idea that the United States will deport 12 million illegal immigrants is ridiculous. (CNN 2.21.08 Debate)
* We are not going to devote all of our law enforcement resources to deporting immigrants.(CNN 2.21.08 Debate).
* “Work with Mexico: Obama believes we need to do more to promote economic development in Mexico to decrease illegal immigration.”

Q: In the absence of comprehensive immigration reform, do you support driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants?

A: Yes. I am going to be fighting for comprehensive immigration reform, and we shouldn’t pose the question that, somehow, we can’t achieve that. The American people desperately want it; that’s what I’m going to be fighting for as president.
Source: 2007 Democratic debate in Las Vegas, Nevada Nov 15, 2007

Q: Would you allow “sanctuary cities” to ignore the federal law & provide sanctuary to immigrants?

A: The federal law is not being enforced not because of failures of local communities, but because the federal government has not done the job that it needs to do.

Q: You would allow the sanctuary cities to exist?
A: What I would do as president is pass comprehensive immigration reform. And controlling our borders but also providing a rational immigration system, which we currently don’t have.
Source: 2007 Democratic primary debate at Dartmouth College Sep 6, 2007

Q: Are you going to create a path to the citizenship for undocumented workers?

A: We have to make sure that employers are held accountable, because right now employers are taking advantage of undocumented workers. And we’ve got to give a pathway to citizenship.
Source: 2007 AFL-CIO Democratic primary forum Aug 8, 2007

* Obama supports the folowing principles regarding immigration:Continue to extend state-funded welfare benefits for legal immigrants.
* Use state funds to continue some Medicaid coverage for legal immigrants.

Source: 1998 IL State Legislative National Political Awareness Test Jul 2, 1998

Voted YES on continuing federal funds for declared “sanctuary cities”.
CONGRESSIONAL SUMMARY: To create a reserve fund to ensure that Federal assistance does not go to sanctuary cities that ignore the immigration laws of the United States and create safe havens for illegal aliens and potential terrorists. This vote is a motion to table the amendment; voting YES would kill the amendment.

SUPPORTER’S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING NO ON TABLING MOTION:Sen. VITTER: There are so-called sanctuary cities which establish as an official policy of their jurisdiction: We are not going to cooperate with Federal immigration enforcement officials. That is wrong. What is more, it is completely contrary to Federal immigration law. My amendment says: We are going to put some consequence to that defiance of Federal law. We are not going to give them COPS funds. We are going to send those funds, instead, to all of those other jurisdictions which abide by Federal law.OPPONENT’S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING YES ON TABLING MOTION:Sen. DURBIN: There are sanctuary cities in about 23 different States across America. What the Vitter amendment will do is to take away the COPS funding from those cities. Police departments will tell you they need the cooperation of everyone to solve crimes and stop crime. If you create fear in the minds of those who are here in an undocumented status that any cooperation with the police will result in their arrest, they will not cooperate and criminals will go free. Let’s not use the COPS Program as some sort of threat. If you want to deal with immigration, deal with it responsibly in a comprehensive way. SUPPORTER’S RESPONSE:Sen. VITTER: If folks feel that way, they should come to Congress and change Federal law, not simply defy Federal law. This is another amnesty vote. Are we going to give folks in sanctuary cities amnesty for defying Federal law and refusing to cooperate with Federal immigration officials? LEGISLATIVE OUTCOME:Motion to Table Agreed to, 58-40
Reference: Bill Table S.Amdt.4309 to S.Con.Res ; vote number 08-S069 on Mar 13, 2008

Voted YES on continuing federal funds for declared “sanctuary cities”.
CONGRESSIONAL SUMMARY: To create a reserve fund to ensure that Federal assistance does not go to sanctuary cities that ignore the immigration laws of the United States and create safe havens for illegal aliens and potential terrorists. This vote is a motion to table the amendment; voting YES would kill the amendment.

SUPPORTER’S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING NO ON TABLING MOTION:Sen. VITTER: There are so-called sanctuary cities which establish as an official policy of their jurisdiction: We are not going to cooperate with Federal immigration enforcement officials. That is wrong. What is more, it is completely contrary to Federal immigration law. My amendment says: We are going to put some consequence to that defiance of Federal law. We are not going to give them COPS funds. We are going to send those funds, instead, to all of those other jurisdictions which abide by Federal law.OPPONENT’S ARGUMENT FOR VOTING YES ON TABLING MOTION:Sen. DURBIN: There are sanctuary cities in about 23 different States across America. What the Vitter amendment will do is to take away the COPS funding from those cities. Police departments will tell you they need the cooperation of everyone to solve crimes and stop crime. If you create fear in the minds of those who are here in an undocumented status that any cooperation with the police will result in their arrest, they will not cooperate and criminals will go free. Let’s not use the COPS Program as some sort of threat. If you want to deal with immigration, deal with it responsibly in a comprehensive way. SUPPORTER’S RESPONSE:Sen. VITTER: If folks feel that way, they should come to Congress and change Federal law, not simply defy Federal law. This is another amnesty vote. Are we going to give folks in sanctuary cities amnesty for defying Federal law and refusing to cooperate with Federal immigration officials? LEGISLATIVE OUTCOME:Motion to Table Agreed to, 58-40
Reference: Bill Table S.Amdt.4309 to S.Con.Res ; vote number 08-S069 on Mar 13, 2008

http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Barack_Obama_Immigration.htm


Obama is against English as a National language. And for bilingual education.

Spanish kids speak Spanish, and English-only speakers are the problem:
“Every student should be learning a second language, because when you start getting into a debate about bilingual education, for example, now, I want to make sure that children who are coming out of Spanish-speaking households had the opportunity to learn and are not falling behind. If bilingual education helps them do that, I want to give them the opportunity. But I also want to make sure that English-speaking children are getting foreign languages”

DOES NOT SUPPORT A BORDER FENCE:
# Voted against Cloture of HR6061 — the Secure Fence Act (a vote against cloture is a vote against the act)
# Voted in favor of HR6061 — the Secure Fence Act
# Voted on Senate floor for passage of HR6061, in favor of border amendment to kill the border fence in 2006 (SA 4188 to S. 2611 would require consultation with Mexico concerning the construction of the fence)
# Click here for Senate Roll Call Vote
# Sen. Obama along with Sen. Hillary Clinton agreed Thursday night at the CNN Debate (2.21.08), that the Secure Fence Act of 2006 Should not be enforced as written.
# Voted for the Secure Fence Act but now believes the act is not the solution.
# Sen. Obama believes “the key is to consult with local communiteis, whether it’s on the commercial interests or the environmental stakes of creating any kind of barrier.
# Sen. Obama would reverse the Secure Fence Act.
# “There may be areas where it makes sense to have some fencing. But for the most part, having border patrolled, surveillance, deploying effective technology, that’s going to be the better approach.”
http://www.firesociety.com/article/21856

Obama went to La Raza last year:
http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/?p=4295

Obama's statement on immigration:

“Millions of undocumented immigrants live and work here without our knowing their identity or their background. We need to strike a workable bargain with them. They have to acknowledge that breaking our immigration laws was wrong. They must pay a penalty, and abide by all of our laws going forward. They must earn the right to stay over a 6-year period, and then they must wait another 5 years as legal permanent residents before they become citizens. ...

Some of the proposed ideas in Congress provide a temporary legal status and call for deportation, but fail to answer how the government would deport 11 million people. I don’t know how it would be done. I don’t know how we would line up all the buses and trains and airplanes and send 11 million people back to their countries of origin.
...
I don’t know many police officers across the country who would go along with the bill that came out of the [Republican] House, a bill that would, if enacted, charge undocumented immigrants with felonies, and arrest priests who are providing meals to hungry immigrants, [this is a false allegation] ...

That approach is not serious. That is symbolism, that is demagoguery. It is important that if we are going to deal with this problem, we deal with it in a practical, commonsense way. If temporary legal status is granted but the policy says these immigrants are never good enough to become Americans, then the policy that makes little sense.”

- Senator Barack Obama, April 2006

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Puppetmaster Soros with Obama




Soros is the guy in the jacket and blue shirt. If you look closely, it appears that Soros is pulling some string with his right hand. And Obama's right hand looks like a marionette hand, just floating up at head-level. This posed "Obamessiah" picture from the Obamedia has so much ... meaning. Breathe in the meaning, Obamaniacs.

UPDATE: Found this comment on LGF: "That said, every day it becomes more apparent to me that BHO is just a pretty boy mouthpiece for someone else. This guy is just a tool of special interests, more akin to LBJ than JFK. Whoever is behind him wants him to be POTUS for one reason only; enrichment."

A PATRIOT’S GUIDE TO THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Some conservatives are withholding support for McCain. Here is my response to those that are on the fence:
1. McCain is a moderate-to-conservative, Obama was rated *most liberal* Senator in the Senate last year. McCain is better on taxes, Judges, Iraq, Iran, GWOT, right-to-life, gun rights, earmarks/spending, and gay marriage (Obama will use his bully pulpit to encourage it)
2. McCain is a capable and experienced man who served the country his whole life, even spending 5 years in a POW camp. Obama has spent a lifetime raised and associated with radicals, marxists, and leftwing activists; he has served ‘the cause’ of leftwing politics only and nothing else. He has no accomplishments worthy of note except getting elected.
3. Ideology aside, and putting just the basic protection of the country on the line, there is no comparison - McCain is better.
4. We vote based on who is best for the country as top priority. Republican conservatives can clean up the mess of RINO poop in the RNC later as a secondary priority, but the top priority of a patriot is what is best for America. Country before party!
5. Based on #1, #2 and #3, McCain is far far better for this country than Obama. Neither man is ‘evil’, but far more bad things will happen to USA if Obama is elected.
6. You never win by losing. The most leftwing President in American history - Obama - will be a huge blow to the conservative cause. Anyone who thinks otherwise is on drugs.

Obama and Kenyan Elections

Letter from Africa

Obama Mired in Scandals Already!

GOP fact sheet on VP Search Team is an embarrassment of riches - Obama picks DC insiders with lots of sweetheart deals in their past.



VP Search Team Reflects Candidate's Affinity For Sweetheart Deals


Eric Holder Was Involved In Sweetheart Deal Which Granted Fugitive Marc Rich A Controversial Pardon From Outgoing President Bill Clinton:

"As Deputy Attorney General, Holder Was The Key Person Who Made The Pardon Of Marc Rich Possible In The Final Hours Of The Clinton Presidency." (Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Op-Ed, "Obama's VP Search Mistake," New York Post, 6/5/08)

Rich Was Under Charges Of Wire Fraud, Tax Fraud, And Illegal Trading With Iran. "[M]arc Rich, the fugitive billionaire who renounced his U.S. citizenship and moved to Switzerland to avoid prosecution for racketeering, wire fraud, 51 counts of tax fraud, evading $48 million in taxes, and engaging in illegal trades with Iran in violation of the U.S. embargo following the 1979-80 hostage crisis." (Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Op-Ed, "Obama's VP Search Mistake," New York Post, 6/5/08)

To Obtain A Pardon, Rich Retained Former White House Counsel Jack Quinn, Who Circumvented Formal Pardon Application Procedures. "[R]ich wanted a pardon and he retained Jack Quinn, former counsel to the president, to lobby his old boss. ... From the start, the Rich lawyers ignored the government's established rules for pardon applications. Instead of making a formal application to the Office of Pardons in the Justice Department, Quinn sent the application directly to the White House in late December of 2007." (Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Op-Ed, "Obama's VP Search Mistake," New York Post, 6/5/08)

Documents Emerged Which Indicated That Holder Had Recommended Quinn, And "Gave Substantive Advice To Quinn Along The Way." "Two days later, documents in support of the pardon were sent by Jack Quinn to Eric Holder. It was Holder who had originally recommended Quinn to one of Rich's advisers, although he claims that he did not know the identity of the client. And he gave substantive advice to Quinn along the way. According to Quinn's notes that were produced to Congress, Holder told Quinn to take the pardon application 'straight to the White House' because 'the timing is good.' ... When Holder received the Rich materials, he did no independent research to determine their veracity and appears to have barely reviewed them." (Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Op-Ed, "Obama 's VP Search Mistake," New York Post, 6/5/08)

* Holder Conducted No Independent Research To Scrutinize Quinn's Request On Behalf Of Rich. "When Holder received the Rich materials, he did no independent research to determine their veracity and appears to have barely reviewed them. ... [H]e never took the time to check anything and simply told the White House that he was 'neutral to positive' on the pardons." (Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Op-Ed, "Obama's VP Search Mistake," New York Post, 6/5/08)
* "Neither Clinton Nor Holder Ever Consulted With The Pardon Attorney." (Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Op-Ed, "Obama's VP Search Mistake," New York Post, 6/5/08)

"Officials At The U.S. Attorney's Office In New York Were Understandably Infuriated When They Learned About The Pardon And Accused Rich Of Deliberating Bypassing Their Office." (Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Op-Ed, "Obama's VP Search Mistake," New York Post, 6/5/08)

"In 2002, A Congressional Committee Reported That Holder Was A 'Willing Participant In The Plan To Keep The Justice Department From Knowing About And Opposing' The Rich Pardon." (Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Op-Ed, "Obama's VP Search Mistake," New York Post, 6/5/08)



Jim Johnson, A Former CEO Of Fannie Mae And Top Obama Campaign Adviser, Received Special Loans From Countrywide:

Jim Johnson, A Former CEO Of Fannie Mae Chosen To Lead Obama's Vice Presidential Search Committee, Received Special Loans From Countrywide Financial CEO Angelo Mozilo. "Countrywide Financial Corp. makes mortgage loans through a vast network of offices, brokers and call centers. But a few customers have gotten their loans a special way: through Countrywide Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo. These borrowers, known internally as 'friends of Angelo' or FoA, include two former CEOs of Fannie Mae, the biggest buyer of Countrywide's mortgages, say people familiar with the matter. One was James Johnson, a longtime Democratic Party power and an adviser to Sen. Barack Obama's campaign, who this past week was named to a panel that is vetting running-mate possibilities for the presumed nominee." (Glenn R. Simpson and James R. Hagerty, "Countrywide Frien ds Got Good Loans," The Wall Street Journal, 6/7/08)

* While CEO Of Fannie Mae, Johnson And Mozilo Worked Closely And Maintained A "Close Friendship." "From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Johnson served as CEO of the Federal National Mortgage Association, also known as Fannie Mae, which worked closely with Countrywide, one of the nation's leading lenders and loan servicing companies. In 1996, Mr. Johnson named Mr. Mozilo as chairman of Fannie Mae's national advisory council. A 1999 article in the American Banker said the two men had a 'close friendship.'" (Josh Gerstein, "Top Talent Scout For Obama Tied To Subprime Lender," The New York Sun, 6/9/08)

"Property Records Show Mr. Johnson Has Received More Than $7 Million In Loans From Countrywide Since 1998, The First Coming In The Waning Days Of His Fannie Mae Tenure." (Glenn R. Simpson and James R. Hagerty, "Countrywide Friends Got Good Loans," The Wall Street Journal, 6/7/08)

* At Least Two Of The Mortgages Were At Rates "Below Market Averages." "The Journal said at least two of the mortgages, among a series of loans made available to people Countrywide officials called 'friends of Angelo,' were at rates below market averages, though it is difficult to predict a market rate without access to nonpublic information about a borrower's credit history and other factors that can reduce interest charges on a loan." (Josh Gerstein, "Top Talent Scout For Obama Tied To Subprime Lender," The New York Sun, 6/9/08)

As Recently As 2003, Johnson Has Praised Mozilo's Leadership Of Fannie Mae, Calling It "Remarkably Impressive." "Since leaving Fannie Mae, Mr. Johnson has lavished praise on Mr. Mozilo's performance, calling it 'remarkably impressive ' in a 2003 interview with BusinessWeek. 'By strengthening servicing in good times, Countrywide has done a brilliant job of insulating itself for the down cycle,' Mr. Johnson told Fortune in 2003." (Josh Gerstein, "Top Talent Scout For Obama Tied To Subprime Lender," The New York Sun, 6/9/08)

* NOTE: "In Recent Months, The Job Has Been Looking Less Than Brilliant, As Countrywide Reported Billions In Losses, Much Of It From So-Called Subprime Loans Made To Borrowers Unqualified For Typical Loans." (Josh Gerstein, "Top Talent Scout For Obama Tied To Subprime Lender," The New York Sun, 6/9/08)

NOTE: Johnson Is Also A Bundler For Obama's Presidential Campaign And Has Committed To Raising $100,000 To $200,000. (Obama For America Website, www.barackobama.com, Accessed 5/19/08)



FLASHBACK: Obama's Campaign Attacked Sen. Clinton's Campaign For Its Countrywide Ties:

Obama Senior Campaign Strategist David Axelrod Criticized Sen. Clinton For Employing Mark Penn, Whose Firm Once Represented Countrywide. MSNBC's Keith Olbermann: "Senator Clinton not stopping to hear a reporter's question about Mark Penn, let alone answer it, leading Penn's counterpart in the Obama campaign to fill in the vacuum about Penn's non-departure departure this morning on MSNBC." David Axelrod: "She's stuck him with him through the revelation that his firm was working fro Blackwater and working for Countrywide, and, you know, so, it`s kind of stunning. Remember that the embassy said they weren't sure whether he was there as a representative of his firm or a representative of Senator Clinton. I mean, I think there are issues associated with this. I'm not - you can use the word hypocrisy, but there are certainly questions that arise from this." (MSNBC's "Countdown," 4/7/08)

OBAMATEUR!!!

Obama bombs in debate and that is why he is ducking the Town Halls with McCain. He's not good unscripted.

Obama Exposed Sites

Naked Obama
Meet Barack Obama
Obama Exposed - the book
NObama08 site on YouTube
Obama's 'clinging' quote

Obama's UN Tax exposed

Obama's Racial Animus Exposed
Wright, however, is a loose cannon. He explained to the New York Times why he was "disinvited":

"When [Obama's] enemies find out that in 1984 I went to Tripoli [in Libya]" to visit Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, Mr. Wright recalled, "with [Black Muslim leader Louis] Farrakhan, a lot of his Jewish support will dry up quicker than a snowball in hell." [March 6, 2007 Disinvitation by Obama Is Criticized By Jodi Kantor]

This was written in May 2007 - great prediction by the columnist!

Obama's Fictionalized Self-History

Obama's accomplishments Faked in his autobiography!:

Monday's Los Angeles Times exploded one of the major myths in Obama's memoir, Dreams From My Father, that Obama had been the spearhead behind efforts to remove asbestos contamination at Altgeld Gardens on the South Side of Chicago: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-obama19feb19,1,7228837.story

In reality, Obama stole the credit from real community activists and "organizers" and appropriated their efforts as his own. Obama covered the tracks to his burglary of the truth by using fictional characters to replace the "real" people in the Altgeld episode. It is no surprise that Sweet reports today Obama was "worried about a pending potentially negative…story."

Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun-Times, who is an unabashed Obama-lover, is also an honest journalist. She too, way back in 2004, questioned Obama's use of fiction as fact, and stated, "It is impossible to know who is real and who is not." (Sun-Times, 2/20/07, see http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/264478,CST-NWS-sweet20.article). Indeed, Ms. Sweet, it is not impossible at all. "Obama" is not real. Mr. Obama is a fictional creation of a very talented and very intelligent bunkum artist, Barry (Barack) Obama. From end to end, from start to finish, Barack Obama is an imaginative self-invention.

In 2004, Sweet writes today, Obama could not remember the identity of one of the key characters in his book: "I don't remember what Smitty's real name was. I think it was Wally." He wrote a book about events that had taken place a few years earlier, and "forgot" the names of his key characters. So much for Obama's respect for fact checking.

UPDATE: As detailed in an article on National Review Online about two weeks ago, B.O. did a lot of work on behalf of ACORN which is an umbrella group of urban Marxists and neo-Trotskyites which attempt to shake down local businesses to fund their radical economic agendas. They attempt to gain control of local school boards so they can indoctrinate the pupils with their Marxist agendas. Back in 2004 and 2006 a number of ACORN "chapters" were alledged to have committed vote fraud. A number of ACORN people were convicted of vote fraud. These are nasty, "in-your-face" radical moobats on a par with Code Pink and International ANSWER.

Profile of an Obama Delegate

Comment: Do any of you remember James ???Yousef??? Yee? He was that former Army Muslim chaplain charged with espionage while serving at Gitmo. It turns out that Yee will represent Obama for Washington state at the Democratic National Convention.

The two are a perfect match. Obama promises to not only close Gitmo, but ???reform??? the USA Patriot Act. He apparently plans to take those steps in between tea parties with state sponsors of terror.

Since the Pentagon in 2004 dropped charges against him, Yee has become a poster boy of the anti-war movement. He???s cashed in on his ignominy with a book claiming he was the target of ???sheer bigotry??? and was silenced for exposing ???systemic??? abuse of prisoners at Gitmo.

One of his biggest boosters in Washington is Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the Muslim convert who insisted on taking the oath of office on the Quran. Ellison is an Obama superdelegate who???s been doing advance work for Obama???s planned tea parties in the Middle East.

Last month, he told an Egyptian weekly that Yee???s ???case was dropped because there was no case to begin with.???

Nice try. Here are the facts:

1. Yee was caught returning to the U.S. with maps of Gitmo prison facilities, among other classified materials, and was arrested at a U.S. airport.

2. He was charged with espionage, mishandling classified documents and lying to investigators.

3. He served hard time in a South Carolina stockade.

4. Two of his Muslim cronies at Gitmo were convicted of stealing or mishandling classified documents.

5. Far from being exonerated, the military dropped charges against him to protect national security.

Guantanamo commander Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, who originally accused Yee of spying, explained that there were ???national security concerns that would arise from the release of the evidence??? if the case moved to trial.

There???s no question that Yee, a captain who converted to Islam, was sympathetic to al-Qaida and Taliban captives at Gitmo.

At times, in fact, he acted more like a defense attorney for the terrorists. He complained that guards subjected them to cruel ???abuse??? and ???psychological torture.???

Waterboarding? Electric shock? No, they committed the sadistic act of mishandling copies of the Quran that Yee had made sure each inmate received.

How Obamaniacs protect themselves

Posted By: Johnsonium @ 06/09/2008 12:28:47

Comment: I have Fox News blocked on my television. I don't even want to see it in passing as I change channels.


http://www.newsweek.com/id/140476/output/comments

Obamedia: Attacking Jews for Barack

Yes! A new word! "Obamedia". Expect to see more of that word as we catalog the examples of the in-the-tank-for-Obama journalists who are dying to be Obama's attack dogs and CYA defenders.

Exhibit One is the Newsweek attack on Senator Lieberman. Mark Hemingway: " Newsweek has a piece this week on Barack Obama — titled “His Jewish Problem: A Myth?” — that is an absolutely Herculean feat of water-carrying for the Illinois senator. But before tackling the factual problems, the article’s biggest problem needs to be addressed — Newsweek aids and abets the Obama campaign’s decision to slander Joe Lieberman:"

Hemingway skewers this dreadful piece of biased journalism for the junk that it is.

And as for this factoid: "Khalidi, a Yasser Arafat toady, got $75,000 through Obama and Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers from the Woods Foundation" - nowhere to be found in the media.

OBama's AIPAC problem

OBAMA DROPS (RADICAL) CATHOLIC COUNCIL

NRO reports:

OBAMA’S CATHOLIC ADVISORY COUNCIL:

HAS IT BEEN DISSOLVED?

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments today on Sen. Barack Obama’s Catholic National Advisory Council:

“On May 2, I issued a news release calling on Sen. Obama to dissolve his Catholic National Advisory Council. My principal reason for doing so was his selection of dissident Catholics to advise him: for example, most of the public officials are so pro-abortion that they had a 100 percent NARAL record. On May 8, most members of the Advisory Council faxed me a letter defending themselves; I answered the same day taking them to task for their lame defense. But it now appears that my initial recommendation—to dissolve the group—may have been accepted.

“There is no mention anywhere on the Obama website of the Catholic National Advisory Council. On Friday, we placed three phone calls to his campaign: two to media relations and one to Mark Linton, Obama’s National Catholic Outreach Coordinator. We were told each time that someone would get back to us, but no one did. I then personally e-mailed Linton informing him of the three phone calls, requesting that he respond to my question: ‘I would like to know whether the Catholic National Advisory Council for Sen. Obama is still operative.’ He has not replied.

“It would appear, then, that the group no longer exists. It is not hard to understand why. After being criticized by the Catholic League, Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City rebuked one of Obama’s Catholic advisors, Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius: she was instructed not to present herself for Holy Communion (she is a rabid defender of abortion). At about the same time, radical Chicago priest Rev. Michael Pfleger bailed on Obama by withdrawing his name from the Advisory Council. Now we find that there is no listing for the group on the Obama website.

“Looks like the Obama campaign’s decision to quietly drop its Advisory Council didn’t work. We found out, and we’ve never been accused of being quiet.”

Obama's Greedhead Pal

Kaus slams Obama on his VP selection committee pick:
"Why would Obama, in his first big personnel decision, choose a paleoliberal greedhead with a track record of failure? You tell me! He's described Johnson as "a friend." It looks as if he was at best highly susceptible to amicable overtures from someone he about whom he should have retained some critical perspective."

Monday, June 9, 2008

Hillary Rants V

DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN lay it out clearly:

HILLARY CLINTON 2012 reply on June 10, 2008 1:09 am:

McCain the War Hero vs Obama the Chicago crook

McCain experience vs Obama do-nothing vote-dodger

McCain military backing vs BO Black Panthers backing

McC pals bombed enemy v BO pals bombed US sites

McC won primary vs Obama stole caucus delegates

McCain true American vs BO & friends un-American

McCain won MI vs Obama hijacked votes & delegates

McCain won FL v Obama cut HRC FL delegates in half

McCain won TX vs BO had thugs steal TX delegates

McCain can run the country vs BO can steal elections

McCain will quit in 4 yrs v Obama won’t even get 4 yrs

McCain has honor & character vs Obama has none

Obama is an anti-baby extremist

OBama is more pro-abortion than NARAL says Amanda carpenter. And Exhibit A of Obama's extremism is his strange opposition to a bill that outlawed infanticide against babies born alive from botched abortions.

When he was in the Illinois Senate, Obama voted against a bill that protected newborns from being murdered. It was a bill that outlawed infanticide.
Jill Stanek has his positions.
Obama's Ten reasons to vote against BAIPA is a catalogue of pathetic excuses that justify the unjustifiable.
Nat Hentoff's view.

Jerusalem Post column:
Jill Stanek, an Illinois nurse, testified in the US Congress in 2000 and 2001 - and before Obama's Illinois Senate Judiciary Committee - about how induced labor abortions were handled at her hospital, relating this story: "One night, a nursing co-worker was taking an aborted Down syndrome baby who was born alive to our Soiled Utility Room because his parents did not want to hold him, and she did not have the time to hold him. I couldn't bear the thought of this suffering child lying alone in a Soiled Utility Room, so I cradled and rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived." Powerful stuff. Obama, however, was reportedly "unfazed" by her testimony.

Various state and federal attempts ensued to curb the gruesome practice, including the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, passed unanimously by both the House and Senate in 2002 (It did not immediately become law.)

In essence, these acts state that, whether wanted or not, once a baby is fully born, it is recognized as fully human and is entitled to equal protection of the law under the 14th Amendment. Even pro-abortion Democrats supported the BAIPA because it contained explicit language that it would not infringe on any abortion rights. Democrat Barbara Boxer, arguably the Senate's most zealous pro-choice advocate, agreed that, with this language, the "amendment certainly does not attack Roe v. Wade."

But not Obama. In March of 2001, Obama's Illinois Judiciary Committee considered a law substantially identical to the BAIPA. It passed the Committee, with Obama voting against. In front of the full Illinois Senate, Obama was the only senator to speak against the bill, arguing that life protection extended to any (!) preterm babies (ponder that) could jeopardize abortion rights. He voted "present," tantamount to a "no" vote. In March of 2002, Obama's Committee passed the Induced Birth Liability Act, requiring medical care for babies who survive induced labor abortions - Obama again voting "present," arguing that the Act would "create one more burden on women, and I can't support that."

In 2003, the Democrats took control of the Illinois Senate, and Obama became Chairman of the Health and Human Services Committee. A Committee member sponsored an Amendment that would adopt the exact same language in Illinois's proposed BAIPA that Senator Boxer was satisfied did not curtail any abortion rights in the federal BAIPA. But as Chairman, Obama unilaterally killed the bill by never allowing a Committee vote, thereby preventing it from being voted on by the full Senate and becoming law.

Obama's position essentially boils down to this: a woman who contracts for an abortion is entitled, one way or another, to a dead baby. A dead baby must result, even if that baby had already been a distinct living being. The killing of some live babies is just part of the price we must pay in order to keep the sacred right to an abortion supreme and absolute, beyond any shadow of a doubt.


Obama is beyond pro-abortion, he is an anti-baby extremist.

Will Media Ignore Obama-Khalidi Connection?

Asks Newsbusters. Reporting on a Hot Air post:

Khalidi, a Yasser Arafat toady, got $75,000 through Obama and Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers from the Woods Foundation, and later Khalidi returned the favor by hosting a fundraiser for Obama. Obama “lavished praise” on Khalidi in 2003 when the former PLO functionary took a job at Columbia University, according to an LA Times article last year. It’s hardly ancient history, and Khalidi is hardly an acquaintance.

"McCain hits Obama on Johnson"

Ouch! That's gotta hurt.

Seriously, it's about corruption and Obama helping his friends once again.

More Obama gaffes

"Uh, I cant hear myself" - "It would cost ... uh."
Another Va gaffe clip
Obama lies about how the coalition of the willing were not really willing. Oh, yes they were.

Barack Obama 'pressed the wrong button' six times when voting in the Senate! Morning Joe is aghast.

Grandma is a 'typical white person'

YouTube roundup of gaffes.

Barack exposed on gaffes
Kids on breahalyzers

Attack of the Obamanuts - Soros and more

Johnson - unforced Obama campaign error
hypocrisy and doublespeak from Obama


Rush had this one too:

OBAMA: Everybody knows that it makes no sense that you send a kid to the emergency room for a treatable illness like asthma, they end up taking up a hospital bed, it costs, when, if you, they just gave, you gave them treatment early and they got some treatment, and a, a breathalyzer, or inhalator, not a breathalyzer. (crowd laughing) I haven't had much sleep in the last 48 hours.

Gateway pundit has them and links to ...

Obama gaffes. A whole blog devoted to his gaffes!

Rush Airs the hate on Obama's Website

Rush takes the LGF ball and runs with it: "Over the weekend, the guy that runs the Little Green Footballs blog, Charles Johnson, found a bunch of things on Obama's website. One of them was the truth of the Jewish lobby and it was one of the most anti-Semitic posts that you've ever seen, and it was still up there, and finally the Obama website took it down. There was also praise from some Muslim militant that was on the website. There are a lot of things -- and I told you this during the primaries and the superdelegates know this -- they are worried silly here. Right now Obama's riding on a wing and a prayer, riding on pure image, the messiah business, but he has five months to go with this stuff. "

Sunday, June 8, 2008

Poll: People say Media is in the tank for Obama

... and they just happen to be right. People say media is biased towards Obama, via FR, via HotAir, a Rasmussen poll result:

Voters have little doubt as to who is benefitting from the media coverage this year—Barack Obama. Fifty-four percent (54%) say Obama has gotten the best coverage so far. Twenty-two percent (22%) say McCain has received the most favorable coverage while 14% say that Hillary got the best treatment…

Looking ahead to the fall campaign, 44% believe most reporters will try to help Obama while only 13% believe that most will try to help McCain. Twenty-four percent (24%) are optimistic enough to believe that most reporters will try to offer unbiased coverage.

Even Democrats tend to believe their candidate will receive better treatment—27% of those in Obama’s party believe most reporters will try to help him win while only 16% believe they will help McCain. A plurality of Democrats—34%–believe most reporters will be unbiased.

Among unaffiliated voters, 44% believe reporters will try to help Obama and 14% believe they will try to help McCain.

The Hillary Rants IV, PUMA Dems speak out!

PUMAPAC.ORG, quickly forming in the wake of the DNC stealing votes for Obama, which sealed Hillary's fate despite winning most of the primaries since March 4th and the most primary votes overall. They are justifiably angry at the stealing of the Michigan and Florida delegates and other acts of arm-twisting that took the nomination from their candidate.

Dr. Dean (Howard Dean, DNC Chairman)

I will not be voting for Obama because:

• he is an imposter pretending to be above politics while violently playing the race card (the final straw was his campaign’s fueling of the RFK statement controversy – how can a true Democrat who is supposed to uphold the loftiest of ideals fuel such vitriol in an already divided time?).
• The unifier successfully divided the democratic party by playing the race card and viciously attacking a well-respected opponent.
• Obama performed terribly in the debates and was never presidential – he parroted Hillary’s responses because he couldn’t give his own (evidence: he repeated her position on negotiating with Cuba only if it released political prisoners and showed other signs of improvement, which conflicted with his own previously stated position that he would negotiate without any preconditions).
• he fanned anti-trade sentiment in small town America which he later faulted as being bitter and clinging to the anti-trade sentiment he began.
• He mailed out flyers criticizing Hillary on NAFTA (while claiming to never run a negative campaign) but was later caught in NAFTAGATE for doing nothing more than political posturing.
• The powers behind the scenes have attempted to manipulate the masses and manufacture consent for the election of this emperor without clothes through the media.
• The youth were deceived through tactics such as the use of the mtv culture and a paid-actress that did not even vote for Obama in the Obama girl video.
• The media coverage was replete with distortions and lies.
• Obama tried to suppress the vote in SD and Montana by releasing false rumors that Hillary was conceding that evening - completely UN-American and UN-Democratic.
• Obama thwarted the re-votes in Michigan and Florida, gaming the system and depriving citizens in those states of their vote - completely UN-American and UN-Democratic.
• The DNC arbitrarily applied the rules: (1) by initially discounting all the delegates in those states; (2) stalling resolution and any possibility of revotes; and (3) ultimately giving Obama four of Hillary’s delegates. Completely UN-American and UN-Democratic.
• The DNC did not apply the rules evenly by failing to punish Obama for campaigning in Florida through national advertising and failing to punish him for appearing in Florida. If the DNC really wished to follow the “RULES” (peevish intonation) then he should have received ZERO delegates for his violations.
• The media, Obama, and the certain members of the democratic party tried to push Hillary out of the process from very early on, AND have tried to discourage any chances that she will be a Vice President.
• Polls lied until they became self-fulfilling prophecies. Hillary and Obama were tied with respect to the educated vote. AND, Hillary brought out a lot of youth vote too.
• I DO NOT TRUST THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF YOU, PELOSI, BRAZILLE, AND OTHERS.

Joanne
Kings County, New York
A PUMA DEMOCRAT

Obama's Leftwing Financial Supporters

Obama bundler Jodie Evans, who co-founded the anti-American group Code Pink, said Osama bin Laden had 'valid arguments' for the 9/11 attacks, gushed over Venezualan dictator Hugo Chavez and bragged about Code Pink's efforts to undermine the war in Iraq in a wide-ranging interview with radio host Paul A. Ibbetson.

Evans co-hosted Sen. Barack Obama's first Hollywood fundraiser in February 2007 and is listed on the Obama website as having bundled up to $100,000 for Obama's presidential campaign.

Evans also personally donated the maximum legal amount, $2300, to the Obama campaign--as has her unemployed student son.

Just weeks before she co-hosted the Hollywood fundraiser for Obama, Evans traveled to Cuba as a guest of the Castro regime where she protested against America.

Obama no friend of 2nd Amendment

NRA on Obama:

The presidential primary season is finally over, and it is now time for gun owners to take a careful look at just where apparent nominee Barack Obama stands on issues related to the Second Amendment. During the primaries, Obama tried to hide behind vague statements of support for “sportsmen” or unfounded claims of general support for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

But his real record, based on votes taken, political associations, and long standing positions, shows that Barack Obama is a serious threat to Second Amendment liberties. Don’t listen to his campaign rhetoric! Look instead to what he has said and done during his entire political career.

FACT: Barack Obama voted to allow reckless lawsuits designed to bankrupt the firearms industry.

FACT: Barack Obama wants to re-impose the failed and discredited Clinton Gun Ban.

FACT: Barack Obama voted to ban almost all rifle ammunition commonly used for hunting and sport shooting.

FACT: Barack Obama has endorsed a complete ban on handgun ownership.

FACT: Barack Obama supports local gun bans in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and other cities.

FACT: Barack Obama voted to uphold local gun bans and the criminal prosecution of people who use firearms in self-defense.

FACT: Barack Obama supports requiring law-abiding gun owners to register their firearms.

FACT: Barack Obama refused to sign a friend-of-the-court brief in support of individual Second Amendment rights in the Heller case.

FACT: Barack Obama wants to eliminate your Right to Carry.

FACT: Barack Obama was a member of the Board of Directors of the Joyce Foundation, the leading source of funds for anti-gun organizations and “research.”

FACT: Barack Obama supported a proposal to ban gun stores within 5 miles of a school or park, which would eliminate almost every gun store in America.

FACT: Barack Obama voted not to notify gun owners when the state of Illinois did records searches on them.

FACT: Barack Obama voted against a measure to lower the Firearms Owners Identification card age minimum from 21 to 18, a measure designed to assist young people in the military.

FACT: Barack Obama favors a ban on standard capacity magazines.

FACT: Barack Obama supports mandatory micro-stamping.

FACT: Barack Obama supports mandatory waiting periods.

FACT: Barack Obama supports repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment, which prohibits information on gun traces collected by the BATFE from being used in reckless lawsuits against firearm dealers and manufacturers.

FACT: Barack Obama supports “one-gun-a-month” sales restrictions.

FACT: Barack Obama supports a ban on inexpensive handguns.

FACT: Barack Obama supports a ban on the resale of police issued firearms, even if the money is going to police departments for replacement equipment. FACT: Barack Obama supports mandatory firearm training requirements for all gun owners and a ban on gun ownership for persons under the age of 21.

Barack Quotes

In Barack's own words:

From Dreams of My Father, “ I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASIVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER’S RACE”.

From ‘Dreams of my Father’, “THE EMOTION BETWEEN THE RACES COULD NEVER BE PURE...THE OTHER RACE WOULD ALWAYS REMAIN JUST THAT; MENACING, ALIEN AND APART.”

From ‘Dreams of My Father’,
“I CEASED TO ADVERTISE MY MOTHER’S RACE AT THE AGE OF 12 OR 13, WHEN I BEGAN TO SUSPECT THAT BY DOING SO I WAS INGRATIATING MYSELF TO WHITES.”

From Dreams Of My Father, “NEVER EMULATE THE WHITE MEN and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. IT WAS INTO MY FATHER’S IMAGE, THE BLACK MAN, SON OF AFRICA, THAT I’D PACKED ALL THE ATTRIBUTES I SOUGHT IN MYSELF”.

From Dreams Of My Father:
“THAT HATE HADN’T GONE AWAY,” he wrote, BLAMING “WHITE PEOPLE— some cruel, some IGNORANT, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”

From Dreams Of My Father;
“There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs,” he wrote. “IT REMAINED NECESSARY TO PROVE WHICH SIDE YOU WERE ON, TO SHOW YOUR LOYALTY TO THE BLACK MASSES, TO STRIKE OUT, AND NAME NAMES. “

From Dreams Of My Father, “I HAD GROWN ACCUSTOMED , everywhere, TO SUSPICIONS BETWEEN THE RACES.”


LOVE OF ISLAM:
.
Quote from Barack Obama’s book, Dreams Of My Father:
“THE PERSON WHO MADE ME PROUDEST OF ALL, though, was [HALF BROTHER ] ROY .. HE CONVERTED TO ISLAM” .

From ‘Dreams of my Father’, “IN INDONESIA, I HAD SPENT TWO YEARS AT A MUSLIM SCHOOL.”
“I STUDIED THE KORAN.”

From ‘Audacity of Hope: “LOLO (Obama’s step father) FOLLOWED .. ISLAM...” “I LOOKED TO LOLO FOR GUIDANCE”.

From ‘The Audacity Of Hope, “I WILL STAND WITH THE MUSLIMS SHOULD THE POLITICAL WINDS SHIFT IN AN UGLY DIRECTION.”

From The Audacity Of Hope, “WE ARE NO LONGER just A CHRISTIAN NATION..We ARE also a Jewish nation, A MUSLIM NATION, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.”

Barack Roundup

Barack's Bad Buds

TPM says Michelle tape rumor based on a novel

Obama's unilateral disarmament

Jeff Head's Audacity of Truth about Obama.

Ancestors, Fathers, and Sons

dKos found out that McCain's ancestors fought in the Civil War, fighting and dying for the confederate cause. Then his grandfather went to the Naval Academy.

The maternal ancestors of Barack Obama, the Democrat who hopes to become America’s first black president, once owned slaves, genealogists have revealed.


McCain’s son are serving the military overseas right now. His son is serving in Iraq, and McCain visited him last Thanksgiving, but McCain has not sought any publicity over it but kept quiet about it. it wasnt even public until press uncovered it in April. See: UK Independent.

On Iraq, it will take a POW who knows the horror of war and who has served and whose father and whose sons are serving to do the right thing for our national security there. McCain has been right on Iraq all along.
Democrats cannot let history record a success in Iraq and are hellbent on failure there and tagging Bush with it. They will bug out prematurely or they will break their promises of premature withdrawal and muddle poorly through. McCain’s consistent stand is far superior.

Obama the Naive

John Bolton takes Obama to school

Obama's Ten Commandments

Obama's 10 Commandments

1. I am Barack, your future president. You shall have no other candidates before me. Especially that entitled, uppity white bitch who thinks that, when it comes to presidential politics, having girl parts trumps dark skin.

2. You shall not make for yourself an idol unless, you know, it is an idol of me. Or me and Che. Just make sure we both have berets on. The beret is the most underrated hat going. Oh, and slap a mustache on me when you make that idol. Damned if I can grow one myself.

3. You shall not ask me really hard questions. Those make my head hurt behind my eyebrows.

4. You shall not bring any video cameras, cell phones with video-making capacity, or tape recording devices of any sort into this house of worship during sermons. I’m on the home stretch here people. Think.

5. Honor your mother and father. Even if one of them is white. However, grandparents are fair game.

6. You shall not kill. However, it is okay to sit down with the leaders of rogue nations bent on destroying America, without preconditions, provided they are not as large as the former Soviet Union.

7. You shall not use oil. There is more than enough sunlight to power the new one-seat solar cars I will be mandating during my first term in office. Besides, is there really any reason that you are going to need to drive faster than five miles per hour anyway?

8. When in doubt, you shall act shocked to discover things that you clearly already know. This works surprisingly well.

9. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. Unless your neighbor is white. Or conservative. Or if you are running for elected office.

10. You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife; you shall not covet your neighbor’s flat screen tv; nor his pontoon boat; nor his new car; nor anything that is your neighbors. Under the new system of government I will be implementing, you won’t have any reason for coveting. We will all have the exact same stuff.
(via LGF via internet, you know, it's makin' the rounds ...)
#203 hooligan

The Hillary Rants III, Hillary's blog

Ugly comments galore after Hillary Clinton's concession speech:

No to OBAMA:
I have thought long and hard about this, because Hillary has asked us to support Obama. My ultimate decision is based on the belief that we need someone that can bring us a better future and Hillary is the only one that can do this. I will not support Obama.
We support you FOREVER!!!

Comment #2:

BUT we will NEVER support BO!!! He doesn't deserve it! He stole it!!! NEVER means NEVER!!!
Also, we will FOREVER remember what BO, his nasty supporters, MSM, & the UNdemocratic DNC did in this election.
McCain 08!!!
Hillary 2012!!!

Comment #3:
Sorry Hillary - I can not support BHO!!!

Comment #4:
I will be working to elect McCain...I can wait 4 years for HIllary to run..BO will not get one penny from me our my family and friends....NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment #5:
No support, no email, no money for BO. I won't sit down and shut up.

Comment #6:
I vote American
When I vote for the Executive Office, I vote American, not the party. I vote for Leadership, Independent thinkin, ready to make tough decisions for America.
I vote Hillary first choice, McCain second choice. Barack's lack of experience, associations and beliefs worry, even scare me.

Comment #7:
Obama, NEVER! Super Delegates, pay attention, Hillary is being forced to give this speech. We will not support Obama, so do what is right at the convention.
Ohio for Hillary - 2008

Comment #8:
Sent her an e-mail
Told her I was voting McCain. I will not fall in line. No matter what she says. I can make up my own mind. I can do my own research.
My vote is what I have left in this campaign. I will not squander it on Obama.
by Kathy from CT at 6/7/2008 1:04:40 PM

Comment #9:
no obama
sorry hillary...love you, supported you, made calls for you, i have unsubscribed...this is the last time i will visit this post....see u in 4 years...we will unite to make sure obama don't get the white house....
by grandmaof3 at 6/7/2008 1:06:27 PM

Comment #10:
Stop already, McCain is not Bush. Bush is gone by
2008. McCain has been more middle of the road, that is why he does not have the Republican right on his side.

We, Hillary supporters have our own minds. We have our own principles and cannot vote for BO. My conscience will not let me. I will not be responsible in making BO win in Nov. I won't be able to sleep at night. An inexperience ,unqualified person to be the President of the USA.

There are variety of Hillary supporters. They are not all Democrats. They can be independents,Regan Democrats , even converted Republicans.

They vote for the person and not the party.
We all will Remember in November, not to vote for OB. We will not fall in line. Thank you.
by JN at 6/7/2008 3:14:49 PM

Comment #11:TO: TeacherOhio, I agree with you. I cannot support Obama, doing so, would say that I approve of the DNC and the way they handled this whole situation. No, I cannot do this. Hillary was mistreated throughout this whole campaign by the Media, the DNC, and other "movers and shakers" in the Democratic Party. No, I don't want to be a member of their club. Not now, not tomorrow. For that reason, I have joined with John McCain, our American Hero. I want to be proud to be an American, in order to do that I must support the true AMERICAN HERO; no inexperience, arrogant Obama for me, not now, NEVER.

by LillaBet at 6/7/2008 2:35:42 PM


Comment #12:

Took My Breath Away

Oh My God!! I just saw BO's name on the homepage and it literally took my breath away!

NEVER NEVER NEVER will I vote for you BO!!!

You Have Done Nothing To Deserve This!!!

No Trust, No Vote!!!

NO TO BO!!! NO TO BO!!! NO TO BO!!! NO TO BO!!!

by Sabrina in California at 6/7/2008 1:40:00 PM

Comment #13:

I know an aide to a lobbyist in Washington who is a young gay black man who is also a lifelong democrat. He was asked what he thought of Obama and he said and I quote "He's the Devil".

"punished with a baby"

'punished with a baby' something someone with no real feelings and emotions for their progeny would say. he was talking abt. his daughter and would be granddaughter here. It is really a chilling statement.

Antisemitism on Obama's campaign website

Goes VIRAL - on LGF.

LGF and "No-Bama" today, Michelle Malkin tomorrw, Hannity by mid-week.

Betting pool on how long before Obama takes it down starts now.

Anti-Hillary Ad creator linked to Obama Campaign

Anti-Hillary Ad creator was part of Obama Campaign:
A photograph obtained by RAW STORY showing former Blue State Digital consultant Phil De Vellis with current Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt conflicted with a claim by Senator Obama that his campaign had "no way of knowing who this person was." ...LaBolt currently serves as Senator Obama's Press Secretary in Washington, DC.


De Vellis had worked on software for the Obama campaign's website while still with Blue State Digital. "I designed the MyBarack Obama toolbox that is on the front page and all the sidebar pages," wrote De Vellis in a Feb. 10 e-mail.


This is old news, but a reminder that Obama's campaign deniedany knowledge at the time. Plausible but phony deniability.

Obama's Campaign links to Marxist Website

"Socialists for Obama" has several radical articles including Links to marxist.com.

Web 2.0 meets up with Leftism 2.0.

Anti-Jewish Fearmongering on Obama's Campaign Site

How the Jew Lobby Works says an Obama supporter with a Farrakhna-like distrust of Jews in our society. On Barack's website. Nice endorsement of anti-semitism, Senator Obama.

The Hillary Rants II, Appalachia Speaks

Political Graffiti on the thread previous linked add a rant:

Dear Mister Obama.

I am Appalachia. I am about to ramble on.

May I present to you a note to process? No. Well I am not surprised. Though your campaign has been telling us you have a new coalition and that you do not want to or need to listen to the majority of Americans, a major part of the majority wants to tell you a few things anyway.

Spray paint us all as the founders of hate and racism. You already did this. After we voted for your opponent in WV you told our local press that you would not be coming to KY because we were too stupid to get past Fox News. You told us you were not going to PR because, as you said: “..you know I need to work on those kind of folks.”

Go ahead. Treat us all of us as Hispanic, Jewish, Appalachian, working folk who don’t get it. Take your spray paint and cover us with your attacks. Please follow me as I ramble. After loosing in PA and OH, instead of campaigning in West Virginia and Kentucky you wrote us off because you assumed we would not like you. You were wrong. We were ready for you. You did not come. We were not amused by your gamesmanship. We were offended by your lack of attention. You will not get our welcome this fall when you need it. The word welcome here is a noun. You may have heard about wearing out your welcome. But we also expect, long before you wear it out, that you to earn it You did nothing to earn your welcome here, much less stay long enough to earn our respect. You stood us up, you Mr. Cheney’s first name.

Appalachia covers a territory of 13 states from the Northern New York region all the way down to Georgia. Appalachian voters represent only about 20% of the total vote in U.S. presidential campaigns but we make up around 80% of what the politicos call the swing states.

At your peril, you ignored us. It may have benefited your overall primary game plan – treating us as the stupid, thinking moderates who would not vote for you under any circumstances because we want to know the sprite before we buy the tree. But your ignorance of the influence of our region is telling.

We spawned the United States of America. There is not a state that does not have our blood. One word from us sparks thought and elevates awareness across the country. Seven major U.S. rivers originate in WV. No water rises to better purity than its origin. And, from where did this country grow? After Williamsburg and Boston it was from here, the headwaters in the hills.

As I indicated above, Mr. Obama, you ignored us at your peril. We, the 13 states of Appalachia, do not forget. We produced more fighters for our country’s defense than any other region, when defense was absolute. And we will not forget to execute our right and duty to vote when “tweaking” is needed more than total Marxist – Ayers style change.

You were wrong to ignore us and we will not listen now, even if you try to tell us you now care. If you could not come here when you were running for our primary election, then you have no solid foundation here, and your street “cred” has no appeal in these hills. The sound of one yelling: “Yo ah Durham” sounds like a Martian talking to a bush to us.

Call my statements what you want. I call them a collection of thoughts representing a personal opinion. We don’t like a crook from Chicago coming here and telling us that we need to change our thinking. We happen to be independents and democrats that believe that we earn what we get and we deserve to get what we earn. Maybe we are slightly libertarian in our belief that we don’t want a government that gives us everything or a government that takes away all the things it thinks we don’t need.

Please do not come here during your fall campaign. Please write us off, like you did in the primary. You have poor judgment, but you did get one thing right in your assumptions: We do not like you. We want you to go away and stay away.

Black Liberation Theology is Marxism

Liberation Theology is the application of Marxist dielectics to religious faith. It is a theology that insists that Marxism is reality and that God therefore must be a Marxist. It is a hijacking of religion, just as Al Qaeda hijacks Islam for a radical political end.

James Cone (as Rev. Wright has said in many interviews) is the “father” of BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY. I think Mr. Cones own words speak volumes:

The leading theorist of Black Liberation Theology is James Cone. Overtly racist, Cone’s writings posit a black Jesus who leads African-Americans as the “chosen people.” In Cone’s cosmology, whites are “the devil,” and “all white men are responsible for white oppression.” Cone makes this point without ambiguity: “This country was founded for whites and everything that has happened in it has emerged from the white perspective,” Cone has written. “What we need is the destruction of whiteness, which is the source of human misery in the world.”

If whiteness stands for all that is evil, blackness symbolizes all that is good. “Black theology,” says Cone, “refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.”

The Hillary Rants

NO Quarter goes ballistic:

UNITY? LOL. I am dropping the dem party on Monday–how’s that.
–I actually feel pretty relaxed…it’s the Obama folks who have to worry about their pride if they lose the WH–maybe they will figure out that he mainly won the red republican states by caucus, that superdelegates went against their own states that Hilalry won to endorse Obama, that Obama coasted on a propaganda machine of lies built by the media, that MI and FL was one big cheat, that Hillary won the popular vote, that Hillary got the majority of the women vote, white working class vote, the rural white vote, the hispanics, the seniors, the catholics, the jews…that absolutley NO ONE can win the White House without, and maybe they will figure out that Hillary won all the big blue states and purple swing states needed to win…I still find it sort of insane that she won New York, California, and Ohio, PA, Florida, etc…and Obama won places like hard-core republican Alaska…and people thought it mattered for Obama only–lol, craziness. Maybe they will figure out that the electoral maps all showed Hillary beating McCain easily and Obama either tied or losing to McCain, and maybe they will all figure out that all those exit polls of more people in Hillary’s group saying that they would never vote for Obama than Obama’s people who would support her. Or maybe they will figure out that Hillary was sometimes outspent 4 to 1, like in PA, but she kept winning and winning and winning, and especially huge in many of the latest contests.

Obama did indeed limp across the finish line…he never even made the nom number, he only got there because of superdelegate promises…it’s a very weak win for Obama. Hillary was the stronger candidate to go up against McCain, and she would have killed him in debates, etc.

Now, Obama, a man who served ONE year in the U.S. Senate before running for president will go up against a 5-year POW American War hero, a man who held two terms in the House of Representatives and has 20 YEARS as a U.S. Senator.

Obama's First Broken Promise

Comment on a blog worth quoting:

"FACT: A vote for McCain is a vote for 4 more years in Iraq”

FACT: The dirty little secret for all you clueless Obama supporters is that Obama will *NOT* get you out of Iraq any faster than McCain will. that was preordained. the elites know it and are just playing for the crowd.

Democrat 2006 promises to get out went unfulfilled.
Obama and the Democrats advocated to be out of Iraq by spring 2008. Didnt happen. For a reason. A quick bug out in 2009 will be Obama’s first broken promise.

McCain hates war as much as any warrior and POW who knows war would. The good news is that Iraq is turning around well enough now that we will be able to draw down troops in a way that wont be an abdication and defeat. Either McCain or Obama, it wont matter, the drawdown pace will be the same.

Saturday, June 7, 2008

Obama's Disarming Plans

IBD Editorial:
In the middle of a war on two fronts, Barack Obama plans to gut the military. He also wants to dismantle our nuclear arsenal. And he wants to keep you in the dark about it.

"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems.

"I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Review is not used to justify unnecessary defense spending.

"Third, I will set a goal for a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop nuclear weapons; ..."

Obama's Inexperience Problem

Obama's (lack of) experience a problem: "ince the Civil War, 49 men have won a major-party presidential nomination. Only three of these nominees were less qualified, by traditional measures of leadership and experience, than Obama.

In the 1872 election, Horace Greeley, backed by the Liberal Republicans and Democrats, was a dilettante newspaper publisher. In his first presidential run in 1896, William Jennings Bryan's only credentials were two terms in the House of Representatives and the ability to give a great speech. (Sound familiar?) Wendell Willkie, who served as FDR's punching bag in 1940, was nothing but a corporate lawyer and Republican Party apparatchik.

None of those men was able to win the White House. But inexperience is not necessarily an electoral liability. Bill Clinton, a draft-dodging state attorney general and governor, bested a sitting president who had served as vice president, congressman, ambassador, and head of the CIA (not to mention being a hero in World War II). ...

Part of Obama's pitch is that his relative inexperience will allow him to approach the problems of governance with a fresh set of eyes. This may prove to be true. But two other recent presidents sought office using that same argument: Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush. Neither of their administrations was covered in glory.

Without experience, a president is hostage to both his advisers and his inner compass. A naïf in matters of economics and foreign policy, Carter was unable to distinguish the bad advice he received about the energy crisis, managing inflation, and the rising Islamic radicalism in Iran.

Bush campaigned as a post-partisan uniter who could get things done because he hadn't been corrupted by Washington. But he couldn't sniff out the bad advice he received from George Tenet and Donald Rumsfeld.

Yet despite, or perhaps because of, their inexperience, Carter and Bush shared an overwhelming confidence in the rightness of their own judgments. Both were, as the expression goes, "comfortable in their own skin" - meaning that they were happy to make decisions based on gut instinct.

Think of it as the presidential version of Malcolm Gladwell's Blink hypothesis that the instant conclusions we reach are often the best ones. This contributed in no small way to their failed presidencies. In terms of Obama's accomplishments, his sense of self, and his insistence that good judgment is more important than experience, his candidacy bears more than a passing resemblance to the candidacies of Carter and Bush."

Yikes. Worse than Carter and worse than Bush, take your pick of 'worst President of my lifetime' comparisons.

Question I would love to ask Obamacarter: What are the failures of the Jimmy Carter administration that you would not repeat and how would you not repeat them?

Friday, June 6, 2008

Meet Barack Obama

Meet Barack Obama includes a GOP ad 'Not ready'.

The surprising thing is that the GOP will have to spend money telling people the obvious, because the media mythology machine has built up so much around Obama they've forgotten to answer the basic question: "Is he ready?" Answer: NO!.

YouTube link of Obama Ad

Sowell on Obama

By Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Many years ago, a great hitter named Paul Waner was nearing the end of his long career. He entered a ballgame with 2,999 hits -- one hit away from the landmark total of 3,000, which so many hitters want to reach, but which relatively few actually do reach.

Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner's 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top.

The official scorer reversed himself and called it an error. Later Paul Waner got a clean hit for number 3,000.

What reminded me of this is the great fervor that many seem to feel over the prospect of the first black President of the United States .

No doubt it is only a matter of time before there is a black president, just as it was only a matter of time before Paul Waner got his 3,000th hit. The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark is reached.

Paul Waner had too much pride to accept a scratch hit. Choosing a President of the United States is a lot more momentous than a baseball record. We the voters need to have far more concern about who we put in that office that holds the destiny of a nation and of generations yet unborn.

There is no reason why someone as arrogant, foolishly clever and ultimately dangerous as Barack Obama should become president -- especially not at a time when the threat of international terrorists with nuclear weapons looms over 300 million Americans.


Many people seem to regard elections as occasions for venting emotions, like cheering for your favorite team or choosing a Homecoming Queen.


The three leading candidates for their party's nomination are being discussed in terms of their demographics -- race, sex and age -- as if that is what the job is about.


One of the painful aspects of studying great catastrophes of the past is discovering how many times people were preoccupied with trivialities when they were teetering on the edge of doom. The demographics of the presidency are far less important than the momentous weight of responsibility that office carries.

Just the power to nominate federal judges to trial courts and appellate courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, can have an enormous impact for decades to come. There is no point feeling outraged by things done by federal judges, if you vote on the basis of emotion for those who appoint them.

Barack Obama has already indicated that he wants judges who make social policy instead of just applying the law. He has already tried to stop young violent criminals from being tried as adults.

Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things -- using the mantra of 'change' endlessly -- the cold fact is that virtually everything he says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.

Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive and subsidizing those who are not -- all this is a re-run of the 1960s.

We paid a terrible price for such 1960s notions in the years that followed, in the form of soaring crime rates, double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment. During the 1960s, ghettoes across the countries were ravaged by riots from which many have not fully recovered to this day.

The violence and destruction were concentrated not where there was the greatest poverty or injustice but where there were the most liberal politicians, promoting grievances and hamstringing the police.

Internationally, the approach that Senator Obama proposes -- including the media magic of meetings between heads of state -- was tried during the 1930s. That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history.

Everything seems new to those too young to remember the old and too ignorant of history to have heard about it.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy.

Clinging Obama

Obama's Clinging Speech in San Fran:

You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Obama's accomplishments

Kirk Watson On Obama's accomplishments - priceless!

Audience can't name one either

Try number 2. They got: He's a Senator, he voted on stuff, he gave a speech, and he's a black man in the U.S. Senate. One woman passed.

Pro-Obama video tries to make a mountain out of molehills of accomplishments.

This one is much more convincing!


"The media can make a wicked man look good and a good man look evil." - Louis Farrakhan. Well, that explains "the mendacity of hype" for sure!

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

McCain Camp Smack-down of Obama on Iran

"In September 2007, over three quarters of the United States Senate joined together in a bipartisan fashion to designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization. Barack Obama opposed this legislation, deciding that playing partisan primary politics was more important than our nation's security. Even Senators Hillary Clinton and Dick Durbin had the judgment to call our enemies by their name, especially a group responsible for the killing of American troops in Iraq. If Barack Obama does not have the judgment and experience to even identify our enemies, how can we expect him to stand up to them?"

The Kyl-Lieberman Amendment Designated Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps A Terrorist Organization - But Senator Obama Opposed It

The Kyl-Lieberman Amendment Called On The United States To Designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) As A Terrorist Organization. The Senate approved the amendment on September 26, 2007 with support from 76 senators, including Sens. Reid, Schumer, Durbin and Clinton. (S.Amdt. 3017, CQ Vote #349: Agreed To, 76-22: R 47-2; D 29-20, 9/26/07)

2007 EXPLANATION: Campaigning For Anti-War Votes In The Democratic Primary, Barack Obama Denounced Kyl-Lieberman As A Justification For Attacking Iran

In October 2007, Obama Described Kyl-Lieberman As A Justification For Attacking Iran. OBAMA: "[The] Bush administration could use the language in Lieberman-Kyl to justify an attack on Iran as a part of the ongoing war in Iraq." (Sen. Barack Obama, "Five Years After Iraq War Vote, We're Still Foolishly Rattling Our Sabers," Manchester Union-Leader, 10/11/07)

? Yet Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) Said The Kyl-Lieberman Amendment Provided No Justification For Attacking Iran. SEN. DURBIN: "If I thought there was any way [Kyl-Lieberman] could be used as a pretense to launch an invasion of Iran, I would have voted no." (Julianna Goldman, "Durbin Says Obama Will Win Iowa Caucus; Disagrees On Iran," Bloomberg, 10/12/07; S.3017, CQ Vote #349: Agreed To, 76-22: R 47-2; D 29-20, 9/26/07, Durbin Voted Yea.)

? Obama's Website Still Describes The Kyl-Lieberman Amendment As A "Reckless" Justification "To Attack Iran." "Obama opposed the Kyl-Lieberman amendment, which says we should use our military presence in Iraq to counter the threat from Iran. Obama believes that it was reckless for Congress to give George Bush any justification to extend the Iraq War or to attack Iran." (Obama '08, http://www.barackobama.com, Accessed 6/2/08)

2008 EXPLANATION: This Week, The Obama Campaign Said Barack Obama Opposed The Kyl-Lieberman Amendment Because Of Troop Levels In Iraq

On Monday, The Obama Campaign Said That The Kyl-Lieberman Amendment Would Urge Our Military In Iraq To Actively Counter Iran. "Obama opposed Kyl-Lieberman because its language said the US military in Iraq should be used to counter Iran, while in fact it has strengthened Iran." ("Obama Camp Response to McCain's AIPAC Speech," Time's "The Page," http://thepage.time.com, Accessed 6/2/08)

? Kyl-Lieberman Amendment Does Not Do Anything Of The Kind. AMENDMENT TEXT: "The manner in which the United States transitions and structures its military presence in Iraq will have critical long-term consequences ... in particular with regard to the ability of the Government of Iran to pose a threat to the security of the region." (Sec. 1538 of HR 1585 (Engrossed Amendment As Approved To By Senate), 9/26/07)

? Senator Lieberman, The Amendment's Author, Removed Provisions From A Draft Version Specifically To Accommodate This Concern: "Because some of our colleagues thought paragraphs three and four of the Sense of the Senate may have opened the door to some kind of military action against Iran, Senator (Jon) Kyl (R-Ariz) and I have struck them from the amendment. ... That is not our intention. In fact, our intention is to increase the economic pressure on Iran and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps so that we will never have to consider the use of the military to stop them from what they are doing to kill our soldiers." (Jake Tapper, " The Persian Conundrum," ABC News, 10/8/07)

ANOTHER 2008 EXPLANATION: In Preparation For His AIPAC Speech, Barack Obama Is Insisting He Always Supported Designating The IRGC As A Terrorist Organization

In Their Response, The Obama Campaign Stated That Obama Has Taken A Consistent Position. "Obama Has Consistently Urged That Iran's Revolutionary Guard Be Labeled What It Is: A Terrorist Organization." ("Obama Camp Response to McCain's AIPAC Speech," Time's "The Page," http://thepage.time.com, Accessed 6/2/08)

? After The Kyl-Lieberman Vote, Barack Obama Often Criticized The Amendment Without Mentioning Any Support For IRGC Designation. (Sen. Barack Obama, "Five Years After Iraq War Vote, We're Still Foolishly Rattling Our Sabers", Manchester Union-Leader, 10/11/07; "Interview With Barack Obama", New York Times, 11/1/07; NBC's "Meet the Press", 11/11/07)

? Before Responding To John McCain, Obama's Website Provides No Indication That Obama Favors Designating The IRGC As A Terrorist Organization. (Obama '08, http://www.barackobama.com, Accessed 6/2/08)

The Obama Campaign Points To Barack Obama's Co-Sponsorship Of The Iran Counter-Proliferation Act (S.970) As Evidence That He Favors Designating The IRGC As A Terrorist Organization. "Obama Cosponsored The Iran Counter-Proliferation Act, Which Would Designate The Iranian Revolutionary Guard As A Terrorist Organization." ("Obama Camp Response to McCain's AIPAC Speech," Time's "The Page," http://thepage.time.com, Accessed 6/2/08)

? There Has Been No Floor Action On S.970 Since 3/22/07 And It Has Never Been The Subject Of A Floor Vote. (S.970, Introduced 3/22/07, Referred To The Committee On Finance, 3/22/07)

Sen. Hillary Clinton Supported The Kyl-Lieberman Amendment Arguing That It Would Advance Diplomacy

Sen. Clinton: "Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard is in the forefront of that, as they are in the sponsorship of terrorism. So some may want a false choice between rushing to war -- which is the way the Republicans sound; it's not even a question of whether, it's a question of when and what weapons to use -- and doing nothing. I prefer vigorous diplomacy, and I happen to think economic sanctions are part of vigorous diplomacy. We use them with respect to Nor th Korea. We use them with respect to Libya. And many of us who voted for that resolution said that this is not anything other than an expression of support for using economic sanctions with respect to diplomacy. You know, several people who were adamantly opposed to the war in Iraq, like Senator Durbin, voted the same way I did and said at the time that if he thought there was even the pretense that could be used from the language in that non-binding resolution to give George Bush any support to go to war, he wouldn't have voted for it. Neither would I." (Sen. Hillary Clinton, MSNBC Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Philadelphia, PA, 10/30/07)

? Click Here To Watch The Video

Sen. Clinton: "My understanding of the Revolutionary Guard in Iran is that it is promoting terrorism. It is manufacturing weapons that are used against our troops in Iraq. It is certainly the main agent of support for Hezbollah, Hamas and others, and in what we voted for today, we will have an opportunity to designate it as a terrorist organization, which gives us the options to be able to impose sanctions on the primary leaders to try to begin to put some teeth into all this talk about dealing with Iran." (Sen. Hillary Clinton, MSNBC Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Hanover, NH, 9/26/07)

? Click Here To Watch The Video

Obama's Weak And Inconsistent Judgment In Regard To The IRGC Fits With An Established Pattern of Changing Positions On Key National Security Issues In Recent Weeks

At A July 2007 Debate, Obama Announced He Would Personally Meet With Leaders Of Iran, North Korea, Syria And Other Hostile Nations "Without Precondition." Question: "[W]ould you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?" ... Obama: "I would. And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them -- which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration -- is ridiculous." (CNN/You Tube Democrat Presidential Candidate Debate, Charleston, SC, 7/23/07)

In The New York Times, Barack Obama Claimed "I Didn't Say That I Would Meet Unconditionally." Obama: "I didn't say that I would meet unconditionally as John McCain maintained, because that would suggest whether it was useful or not, whether it was advancing our interests or not, I would just do it for the sake of doing it ... That's not a change in position, that's simply responding to distortions of my position." (Jim Rutenberg And Jeff Zeleny, "Obama Seeks To Clarify His Disputed Comments On Diplomacy ," The New York Times, 5/29/08)

Obama in a Nutshell (Peanut-shell, that is)

Politics ain't beanbag, as someone once said, and we hope that attacks on Obama's leftist and quasi-Marxist positions and associations will not be deflected as racist criticisms. The heat he will face in this campaign is nothing compared with what he would face on the world stage.

After the last balloon is popped, what we have is a 46-year-old freshman senator who has spent three years in the U.S. Senate, two of them running for president. As we have noted, his policy is basically to raise taxes at home and to surrender to our enemies abroad.

His choice of friends, associates, pastors and churches bespeaks a lack of judgment that gives us pause as to who will fill important positions in the government and his cabinet. We'd prefer that the next secretaries of defense, energy and state, as well as the next Supreme Court justices be appointed by a President McCain.

Some will say the nation has finally accepted the idea of a black American running for president. So far, the only thing certain is that it's OK for a black Democrat to run for president. We wonder, for example, if the press would swoon if it were a Condoleezza Rice running as a Republican.

There's much to criticize about Obama. He promised a post-racial candidacy, but he brought race to the fore with his associations with a church that embraces black liberation theology and one preacher who said the U.S. government invented AIDS to kill black people and another who said Obama's opponent, Hillary Clinton, was the embodiment of white entitlement.

It was out of political expediency, not principle, that he renounced them and the church that gave them standing ovations. His other associations — from influence peddler Tony Rezko to terrorist bombers William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn — cannot be dismissed as people from the neighborhood.

Obama will warn the nation that McCain represents a third Bush term. We'll do our best to point out that even if true, it's a better prospect than the second coming of Jimmy Carter. His naivete on foreign policy and his willingness to make nice with the world's loons have won the endorsement of Hamas leaders.

On the domestic front, Obama proposes to replace the American dream with a mandate of service and servitude to an ever-larger federal behemoth. He will repeal the Bush tax cuts and add new burdens.

He says: "You can take your diploma, walk off this stage and chase only after the big house and the nice suits and all the other things that our money culture says you should. But I hope you don't."

Well, we hope you do — and so does John McCain. America needs more people like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, people who needn't apologize for making money while making our lives better and our country stronger.

We wonder how many will vote for Obama just to have the opportunity to make more history. The nation cannot afford eight or even four years of him. His policies would lead us to an economic and strategic disaster of historical proportions.

We've made enough history for now.

Barry's Friend Tony Rezko is Convicted

Rezko Convicted: Obama Once Again Shocked to Learn What His Friends Are Actually Like: " A federal jury today convicted developer Antoin “Tony” Rezko of corruption charges for trading on his clout as a top adviser and fundraiser to Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

Rezko’s guilty verdict on 16 of 24 corruption counts could . . . prove a political liability for U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, who once counted Rezko as a friend and fundraiser, as the likely Democratic presidential nominee heads into the general election campaign against Republican John McCain.
“I’m saddened by today’s verdict,” Obama said Wednesday. “This isn’t the Tony Rezko I knew, but now he has been convicted by a jury on multiple charges that once again shine a spotlight on the need for reform. I encourage the General Assembly to take whatever steps are necessary to prevent these kinds of abuses in the future.”

“This isn’t the Tony Rezko I knew.” Reminds me of what Obama said about Rev. Jeremiah Wright:

The person I saw yesterday was not the person that I met 20 years ago.
javascript:void(0)

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

OBAMA: He was my pastor

OBAMA: He was my pastor, and he built a terrific church. I'm proud of that church. We've got a wonderful young pastor who's there, who's doing, uh -- continuing the terrific work that the church does, and that's my commitment. My commitment are to the values of -- of that church.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2024935/posts?page=2#2

Clinton on Obama's Lack of Experience

The Experience Factor

Marxist-Leninist Wing of the DNC Rejoices!

Their man has made it! Bill Bennett opines:

The Democratic party is about to nominate a far left candidate in the tradition of George McGovern, albeit without McGovern’s military and political record. The Democratic party is about to nominate a far-left candidate in the tradition of Michael Dukakis, albeit without Dukakis’s executive experience as governor. The Democratic party is about to nominate a far left candidate in the tradition of John Kerry, albeit without Kerry’s record of years of service in the Senate. The Democratic party is about to nominate an unvetted candidate in the tradition of Jimmy Carter, albeit without Jimmy Carter’s religious integrity as he spoke about it in 1976. Questions about all these attributes (from foreign policy expertise to executive experience to senatorial experience to judgment about foreign leaders to the instructors he has had in his cultural values) surround Barack Obama. And the Democratic party has chosen him.

Bennett at NRO

Pfleger

Pfleger says

“America is the greatest sin against God;”


And there is an Axelrod-Pfleger connection too. Connect the dots, folks.

Obama, Leftwing "New Party"-endorsed candidate

Last week at RedState we uncovered the news that Barack Obama was endorsed by something called the New Party. Since then we have investigated what the New Party was.

It is abundantly clear that the New Party was a political party designed to push the Democratic Party to the far left. It's membership was an amalgamation of socialists, unrepentant communists, union activists, urban activists, and environmentalists.

You can read all about the New Party and Obama's rise to power here.

Its platform included such lovely ideas as government takeovers of all banking institutions, much higher taxes, and massive reductions in the military. To win the nomination of the New Party, a candidate would have to agree to sign a statement expressing loyalty to the party.

By the time Barack Obama sought the party's nomination for his first election in 1996, the New Party had well established itself as the major third party alternative for leftists who thought the Democratic Party had drifted too far to the right.

There is absolutely no doubt that Barack Obama knew what the New Party was. Barack Obama actively sought and received the endorsement of this far left group and, with it, was able to win his election. He was willing to express his loyalty to this far left party. The radical left Democratic Socialists of America praised the New Party's endorsement of Obama and itself promoted Obama.

None of us should buy into the notion that the man is somehow different because of his silver tongue. He is a political opportunist, a die-hard leftist, or both. It is clear, based on what the New Party was and Obama's connection to it, that he is the candidate of a repudiated past that we should not want to resurrect.


Monday, June 2, 2008

Obama = Carter

Carter had a Change Campaign!

Earmarks are coming home to roost

I saw this at fox news:
Obama’s ex-Church has received 15 million in federal grant money!

The chickens indeed are coming home to roost.

DONT TRUST ANY VOTER UNDER 30!

"Why should Obama have to give account for what a priest says? Why should he have to hold a press conference about what a priest says? What sense does that make? That IS a distraction and it's entirely irrelevant. "

Obama's campaign is a distraction and is irrelevent to the real Obama.
Obama is a hardcore leftwing zero accomplishment junior senator who's gotten over-promoted on his skills at the teleprompter.

Obama offers nothing new but the same old lies of 'change' and 'hope' wrapped around a corrupt, socialist, not-ready-for-the-job, junior Senator.
This guy is another Jimmy Carter or worse and will be a disaster as president.

He says the lines well enough, but the older voters smell this cr*p for what it is. This guy gave corrupt *earmarks* to this America-bashing Pfleger guy and has the audacity to LIE to us about 'changing Washington'. Wake up fools! Soros didn't pay good leftwing billionaire money to have Obama actually do *that*!!!

Wise comment here: "Hang out with the hate mongers and most likely you are a hate monger yourself or a sleeze who wants to use the hate mongers to further your interests. It cannot be anything else. "

See, Obama-maniacs will say Obama is not a hatemonger like these guys who were his friends, who he gave money to, who he got earmarked funds for ... fine, then Obama associates with hatemongers to get ahead. Is that the mark of a President!??! Or a dirty sleazy politician who will get in the dirt to get ahead?

The Who said "Dont get fooled again"

I say: DONT TRUST ANY VOTER UNDER 30! They are getting fooled by Obama's "American Idol" style campaign, but its all a charade.
There's a Democrat born every minute.

Pfleger is closely associated with Obama

1) Obama and Pfleger have been close friends for 20 years;

2) Obama has given over $200,000 in earmark funds to Pfleger.

3) Obama named Pfleger as his "moral compass" in a Chicago-Sun Times article from 2004.

4) Pfleger was on Obama's advisor committee until 2 weeks before this sermon when he voluntarily stepped down.

There's a Democrat born every minute.

"Almost all clinton supporters put ending the war, roe, women's rights, the pain of carrying the wealthy tax breaks, healthcare crumbling, etc"

Translation: Killing the unborn, jacking up healthcare costs with more Govt regulations, cut-n-running from Iraq (even if we've turned the corner), bashing males and whites with race and sex-preferences, raising taxes on work and families, and destroying democratic principles with judicial activist judges, are *so important* that die-hard Democrats will STILL vote for that unexperienced zero accomplishment, empty-suit junior Senator with the plagiarized-campaign and the racist church and the terrorist friend Ayers.

All because of his vapid and shallow 'hope' and 'change' BS.

The worst nominee ever, at a time when the Democrats have never been more wrong nor more left than before, and this guy is amazingly electable. P.T. Barnum was right. There's a Democrat born every minute.

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Obama get "no quarter"

NO QUARTER Larry Johnson's crew is in a Hillary freindly mode:

"Suddenly discovering what we already have known about this pig for a year or longer, here’s CNN telling you what a dirty politician he really is. Change and Hope? “No more politics as usual?” Indeed, Indeed, Indeed. What we have here is a Dirty Politician and a panderer. A bambzooler. A hoodwinker. A man who kills off whatever is in his way. A Chicago Thug, just like we all knew he was while CNN pretended not to notice."

... and they have the goods to prove it.

OBAMA: the Post-modern Coup

Obama announces Brooklyn Bridge for Sale

Spokesman: Obama Decision to Leave Church Not Politically Motivated. Wow, does he think we are that gullible? Believe that and I'll sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.

Obama losing it in LA

McCain over Obama 50% to 41% in LA
... that's Louisiana, not Los Angeles.

CNN does Obama Gaffe Whitewash

CNN Removed Obama's 'Fallen Heroes' Gaffe from Soundbite

Obama doesn't need to even campaign. He's got the media in the tank for him.

TUCC Corruption of the Church

Obama's favorite